Page 77 - 《中国药房》2026年10期
P. 77

维得利珠单抗与英夫利西单抗在Bio-naive溃疡性结肠炎患者中

          的疗效和安全性比较
                                          Δ


          姚堆堆 ,栗菲雪 ,武佳琪 ,刘晓兵 ,温红萍 (1.山西省人民医院药学部,太原 030012;2.山西医科大学药学
                                                   1 #
                                  2
                                          3
                          1
                 1*
          院,山西 晋中 030619;3.山西省人民医院消化内科,太原 030012)
          中图分类号  R574.62;R969.4      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2026)10-1307-06
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.10.12

          摘  要  目的  比较维得利珠单抗(VDZ)与英夫利西单抗(IFX)在初次使用生物制剂(Bio-naive)中重度活动期溃疡性结肠炎
         (UC)患者中的疗效和安全性,并分析其疗效影响因素。方法  回顾性收集2023年6月-2024年6月在山西省人民医院消化内科
          接受治疗的Bio-naive中重度活动期UC患者的临床资料。根据其所用生物制剂的种类,分为IFX组(41例)和VDZ组(30例)。两
          组患者均接受IFX(5 mg/kg)或VDZ(300 mg)进行诱导缓解和维持缓解治疗。比较两组患者治疗后的改良Mayo评分、血清学指
          标(血红蛋白、白蛋白、血小板计数、红细胞沉降率、C反应蛋白)、联合用药情况、疗效相关指标(临床反应率/缓解率、内镜反应率/
          缓解率)和不良反应发生情况;基于Logistic回归模型进行单因素、多因素分析,挖掘影响治疗第14周时临床缓解和治疗第38周时
          内镜缓解的潜在因素。结果  两组患者治疗第 14、38 周时的临床反应率/缓解率、内镜反应率/缓解率比较,差异均无统计学意义
         (P>0.05);而VDZ组治疗第14周时联用激素的患者比例为26.67%,显著高于IFX组的7.50%(P<0.05)。两组患者总不良反应发
          生率比较的差异虽无统计学差异(P>0.05),但IFX组均为导致治疗中止的3级不良反应(6例),而VDZ组则为未中断治疗的2级
          不良反应(1例)。单因素、多因素回归分析结果显示,疾病类型(复发)与患者治疗第14周时临床缓解、有吸烟史与患者治疗第38
          周时内镜缓解分别显著相关(比值比均为0.08,95%置信区间分别为0.01~0.77、0.01~0.91,P<0.05)。结论  对于Bio-naive中重
          度活动期UC患者,VDZ和IFX在诱导和维持临床缓解、促进黏膜愈合方面的效果及总体安全性相当;尽管IFX可在疾病早期更快
          实现炎症控制,但其所致不良反应更为严重。临床类型(复发)和有吸烟史分别是影响短期临床缓解和长期内镜缓解的独立负面
          预测因素。
          关键词  维得利珠单抗;英夫利西单抗;溃疡性结肠炎;初次使用生物制剂;中重度;疗效;安全;影响因素

          Comparison  of  the  efficacy  and  safety  of  vedolizumab  versus  infliximab  in  Bio-naive  patients  with
          ulcerative colitis
          YAO Duidui ,LI Feixue ,WU Jiaqi ,LIU Xiaobing ,WEN Hongping(1.  Dept.  of  Pharmacy,  Shanxi  Provincial
                                         2
                               1
                     1
                                                                       1
                                                       3
          People’s  Hospital,  Taiyuan  030012,  China;2.  School  of  Pharmacy,  Shanxi  Medical  University,  Shanxi
          Jinzhong  030619,  China;3.  Dept.  of  Gastroenterology,  Shanxi  Provincial  People’s  Hospital,  Taiyuan  030012,
          China)
          ABSTRACT   OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) versus infliximab (IFX) in biologic-naive
         (Bio-naive)  patients  with  moderate-to-severe  active  ulcerative  colitis (UC),  and  to  analyze  the  factors  influencing  efficacy.
          METHODS  Clinical  data  were  retrospectively  collected  from  Bio-naive  patients  with  moderate-to-severe  active  UC  who  received
          treatment in the Department of Gastroenterology at Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital from June 2023 to June 2024. Based on the
          type  of  biologic  agent  administered,  the  patients  were  divided  into  the  IFX  group (41  cases)  and  the  VDZ  group (30  cases).
          Patients in the two groups received IFX (5 mg/kg) or VDZ (300 mg) for induction and maintenance of remission therapy. The two
          groups  were  compared  regarding  modified  Mayo  score,  serological  indicators (hemoglobin,  albumin,  platelet  count,  erythrocyte
          sedimentation  rate,  C-reactive  protein),  combined  medication,  efficacy-related  indexes (clinical  response  rate/remission  rate,  and
          endoscopic  response  rate/remission  rate),  and  the  occurrence  of  adverse  drug  reactions (ADR).  Based  on  Logistic  regression
          model,  univariate  and  multivariate  analyses  were  conducted  to  identify  potential  factors  influencing  clinical  remission  at  week  14
                                                             and  endoscopic  remission  at  week  38.  RESULTS  There  were
             Δ 基金项目 吴阶平医学基金会科研专项资助课题(No.320.6750.
                                                             no  statistically  significant  differences  in  clinical  response  rate/
          2025-18-47);北京智慧医疗技术创新联盟 2025 年度“智慧药学”领域
                                                             remission  rate,  or  endoscopic  response  rate/remission  rate
          立项课题(No.ZHYX-2025-014)
             * 第一作者 主 管 药 师 。 研 究 方 向 :临 床 药 学 。 E-mail:     between  the  two  groups  at  weeks  14  and  38 (P>0.05).
          Yaodd1973@163.com                                  However,  at  week  14  of  treatment,  the  proportion  of  patients
             # 通信作者 主任药师,硕士。研究方向:药事管理、临床药学。                  using  concomitant  corticosteroids  in  VDZ  group  was  26.67%,
          E-mail:whpkuaile@163.com                           significantly  higher  than  the  7.50%  in  IFX  group (P<0.05).


          中国药房  2026年第37卷第10期                                              China Pharmacy  2026 Vol. 37  No. 10    · 1307 ·
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82