Page 17 - 《中国药房》2023年8期
P. 17

基于患者调查的丙型肝炎DAA药物医保政策实施效果评价
                                                                                                     Δ


                                   1
                 1*
                                           2 #
          郭一娇 ,郭昭廷 ,胡 明 ,冯海欢 (1.四川大学华西药学院,成都 610041;2.四川大学华西医院医保办,
                           1
          成都 610041)
          中图分类号  R95;R978.7;F840.684      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2023)08-0907-05
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.08.03


          摘  要  目的  为丙型肝炎(以下简称“丙肝”)防治工作的开展以及直接抗病毒(DAA)药物医保支付政策的制定和完善提供参
          考。方法  采用问卷调研的方法对2019-2020年在四川省内某三甲医院进行丙肝治疗并享受成都市丙肝医保政策的患者进行调
          研,比较DAA药物纳入医保目录前后患者的丙肝治疗情况及对DAA药物医保政策的满意度。结果  对644名患者进行了调查研
          究,有效应答人数共计203例。在治疗方案方面,虽然2019年和2020年就诊的患者在用药方案上存在明显差异(P<0.05),但绝大
          多数患者在疗程内获得治愈(200例,98.52%),且无明显不良反应发生(193例,95.07%);在经济负担方面,2020年接受DAA药物
          治疗的患者其自付费用和经济负担明显低于2019年就诊的患者(P<0.05);在患者服务方面,78.82%的患者接受了医保定点医疗
          机构提供的专家咨询服务,但仍有9.85%的患者未接受医院提供的任何患者服务。在门诊报销政策的满意度方面,2020年就诊的患
          者在对于DAA药物医保政策的整体满意度(95.37%)明显高于2019年就诊的患者(81.05%)(P<0.05)。结论  受访患者使用DAA
          药物治疗丙肝的效果较好,且对丙肝DAA药物医保政策表示满意,但定点医疗机构在患者服务规范化管理方面还存在不足。
          关键词  丙型肝炎;直接抗病毒药物;医疗保障;患者满意度;效果

          Effect evaluation of medical insurance policy for hepatitis C DAA drugs based on patient survey
                                                                2
                                                1
                     1
          GUO Yijiao ,GUO Zhaoting ,HU Ming ,FENG Haihuan (1.  West  China  School  of  Pharmacy,  Sichuan
                                    1
          University,  Chengdu  610041,  China;2.  Medical  Insurance  Office,  West  China  Hospital,  Sichuan  University,
          Chengdu 610041, China)
          ABSTRACT   OBJECTIVE  To  provide  reference  for  the  prevention  and  treatment  of  hepatitis  C  and  the  formulation  and
          improvement  of  medical  insurance  payment  policy  for  direct-acting  antiviral (DAA)  drugs.  METHODS  An  questionnaire  survey
          was  conducted  among  the  patients  who  received  hepatitis  C  treatment  in  a  third-grade  class-A  hospital  in  Sichuan  province  from
          2019  to  2020  and  enjoyed  Chengdu  medical  insurance  policy. The  patients’  hepatitis  C  treatment  and  satisfaction  with  the  medical
          insurance policy for DAA drugs were compared before and after DAA drugs were included in the medical insurance list. RESULTS
          A  total  of  203  patients  effectively  responded  among  644  investigated  patients.  In  terms  of  treatment  plans,  although  there  were
          significant  differences  in  the  treatment  plan  between  patients  who  saw  a  doctor  in  2019  and  2020 (P<0.05),  the  vast  majority  of
          patients were cured within the course of treatment (200 cases, 98.52%), and there were no obvious adverse reactions (193 cases,
          95.07%).  In  terms  of  economic  burden,  the  out-of-pocket  costs  and  economic  burden  of  patients  treated  with  DAA  drugs  in  2020
          were  significantly  lower  than  those  treated  with  DAA  drugs  in  2019 (P<0.05);  in  terms  of  patient  services,  78.82%  of  patients
          received  expert  consultation  services  from  designated  medical  institutions,  but 9.85%  of  patients  still  did  not  receive  any  patient
          services  provided  by  the  hospital.  In  terms  of  satisfaction  with  outpatient  reimbursement  policy,  the  overall  satisfaction  of  patients
          who  saw  a  doctor  in  2020 (95.37%)  was  significantly  higher  than  those  who  saw  a  doctor  in  2019 (81.05%)(P<0.05).
          CONCLUSIONS The surveyed patients with hepatitis C obtain good efficacy after DAA drugs treatment, and are satisfied with the
          medical  insurance  policy  of  DAA  drugs,  but  the  standardized  management  of  patient  services  in  designated  medical  institutions  is
          insufficient.
          KEYWORDS    hepatitis C; direct-acting antiviral drugs; medicare security; patient satisfaction; effect


                                                                      [1]
              丙型病毒性肝炎,简称“丙型肝炎”或“丙肝”,是由                       HCV感染 。大多数慢性丙肝确诊时已处于疾病晚期,
          丙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis C virus,HCV)引起的一种传染               或已进展为肝硬化和肝癌 ,这对患者的生命健康造成
                                                                                    [2]
          病。其中,病毒血症持续 6 个月仍未清除者,为慢性                          了严重危害。丙肝的传统治疗方案为 α 干扰素联合利

             Δ 基金项目 四川省科技计划项目(No.2021YFS0145)                巴韦林(以下简称“PR 方案”),但该方案存在治疗效果
             *第一作者 硕士研究生。研究方向:药物政策、药物经济学。                    不佳、疗程较长等问题           [3―4] 。直接抗病毒(direct-acting
          E-mail:838099386@qq.com
                                                             antiviral,DAA)药物的上市,显著提高了主要基因型丙
             # 通信作者 实习研究员,硕士。研究方向:生物统计、医保政策。
                                                                         [5]
          E-mail:53841484@qq.com                             肝患者的疗效 ,但其高昂的药品价格限制了DAA药物

          中国药房  2023年第34卷第8期                                                 China Pharmacy  2023 Vol. 34  No. 8    · 907 ·
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22