Page 104 - 2020年19期
P. 104
dation of a health policy model of type 2 diabetes in Chi- US setting[J]. J Med Econ,2018,21(5):497-509.
nese setting[J]. J Comp Eff Res,2018,7(8):749-763. [21] 王芳旭,陶立波.德谷胰岛素对比甘精胰岛素在基础胰岛
[12] POLLOCK RF,VALENTINE WJ,MARSO SP,et al. 素联合餐时胰岛素疗法中治疗中国 2 型糖尿病的成本-
Long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec versus 效用分析[J].中国药物经济学,2019(7):9-13、35.
insulin glargine U100 in the UK:evidence from the basal- [22] EDDY DM,HOLLINGWORTH W,CARO JJ,et al. Mo-
bolus subgroup of the DEVOTE trial(DEVOTE 16)[J]. del transparency and validation:a report of the ISPOR-
Appl Health Econ Health Policy,2019,17(5):615-627. SMDM modeling good research practices task force-7[J].
[13] VIRIATO D,CALADO F,GRUENBERGER JB,et al. Value in Health,2012,15(6):843-850.
Cost-effectiveness of metformin plus vildagliptin com- [23] PALMER AJ,Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group,CLAKE P,
pared with metformin plus sulphonylurea for the treat- et al. Computer modeling of diabetes and its complica-
ment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus:a Portu- tions:a report on the fifth mount hood challenge meet-
guese healthcare system perspective[J]. J Med Econ, ing[J]. Value in Health,2013,16(4):670-685.
2014,17(7):499-507. [24] GERSTEIN HC,MILLER ME,BYINGTON RP,et al. Ef-
[14] CHIN KL,OFORI-ASENSO R,Si S,et al. Cost-effective- fects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes[J]. N
ness of first-line versus delayed use of combination dapa- Engl J Med,2008,358(24):2545-2559.
gliflozin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabe- [25] ASCHE CV,HIPPLER SE,EURICH DT. Review of mo-
tes[J]. Sci Rep,2019. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-40191-8. dels used in economic analyses of new oral treatments for
[15] GOURZOULIDIS G,TZANETAKOS C,IOANNIDIS I, type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Pharmacoeconomics,2014,32
et al. Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin for the treatment (1):15-27.
of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at increased car- [26] GU S,WANG X,QIAO Q,GAO W,WANG J,DONG H.
diovascular risk in Greece[J]. Clin Drug Investig,2018,38 Cost-effectiveness of exenatide twice daily vs insulin
(5):417-426. glargine as add-on therapy to oral antidiabetic agents in
[16] NGUYEN E,COLEMAN C I,NAIR S,et al. Cost-utility patients with type 2 diabetes in China[J]. Diabet Obes
of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high Metab,2017,19(12):1688-1697.
cardiovascular risk[J]. J Diabet Complications,2018,32 [27] CHAROKOPOU M,MCEWAN P,LISTER S,et al. The
(2):210-215. cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sulfonylurea as
[17] POLLOCK RF,VALENTINE WJ,MARSO SP,et al.DE- an add-on to metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes
VOTE 5:evaluating the short-term cost-utility of insulin mellitus[J]. Diabet Med,2015,32(7):890-898.
degludec versus insulin glargine U100 in basal- bolus regi- [28] CHAROKOPOU M,SABATER FJ,TOWNSEND R,et al.
mens for type 2 diabetes in the UK[J]. Diabet Ther,2018, Methods applied in cost-effectiveness models for treat-
9(3):1217-1232. ment strategies in type 2 diabetes mellitus and their use in
[18] EVANS M,CHUBB B,GUNDGAARD J. Cost-effective- Health Technology Assessments:a systematic review of
ness of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in adults the literature from 2008 to 2013[J]. Curr Med Res Opin,
with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Diabet Ther, 2015,32(2):207-218.
2017,8(2):275-291. [29] American Diabeteds Association Consensuspanel. Gui-
[19] EVANS M,GUNDGAARD J,HANSEN BB. Cost-effec- delines for computer modeling of diabetes and its compli-
tiveness of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic cations[J]. Diabet Care,2004,27(9):2262-2265.
insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes from a Da- [30] CARO JJ,BRIGGS AH,SIEBERTU,et al. Modeling
nish health-care perspective[J]. Diabetes Ther,2016,7 good research practices-overview:a report of the ISPOR-
(4):809-823. SMDM modeling good research practices task force-1[J].
[20] CHAKRAVARTY A,RASTOGI M,DHANKHAR P, Value in Health,2012,15(6):796-803.
et al. Comparison of costs and outcomes of dapagliflozin (收稿日期:2020-03-24 修回日期:2020-08-17)
with other glucose-lowering therapy classes added to met- (编辑:刘明伟)
formin using a short-term cost-effectiveness model in the
·2398 · China Pharmacy 2020 Vol. 31 No. 19 中国药房 2020年第31卷第19期