Page 32 - 《中国药房》2026年5期
P. 32

某市紧密型县域医共体集中(云)审方中心建设现状及发展建议
                                                                                                           Δ


                                           1 #
                 1*
          何 璐 ,朱鸣阳 ,胡晓蕾 ,钱 妍 (1.重庆医科大学附属第二医院药学部,重庆 400010;2.重庆大学附属沙
                                   2
                           1
          坪坝医院药学部,重庆 401300)
          中图分类号  R-1;R952      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2026)05-0578-06
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.05.05

          摘   要  目的  调研某市已建成和筹建中的紧密型县域医共体集中(云)审方中心(简称“审方中心”)实际建设和运行情况,为提高
          审方中心建设质量提供参考。方法  采用线上问卷收集某市51家已建成和筹建中的审方中心的基本情况、经费来源、人才管理、
          制度建设、审方规则维护、处方审核、处方点评和审方中心数据利用情况以及当前面临的困难,并进行数据汇总分析。结果  共计
          回收有效问卷51份,包括32家已建成和19家筹建中的审方中心。在已建成的32家审方中心中,建设经费来源途径为财政经费拨
          款的占比最高,为56.25%;仅25.00%的审方中心药师的资质完全符合国家规范要求;审方规则月均维护条目数大于10条的审方
          中心的占比仅为 55.00%;处方审核工作对门诊处方实现了全覆盖,但有 37.50% 的审方中心仅能支持单张处方合理性审核,
          50.00%的审方中心尚不支持调阅检验检查结果辅助审方;有40.62%的审方中心尚未常规开展对基层医疗机构的处方点评;审方
          中心数据主要用于用药监测。在筹建中的19家审方中心中,有63.16%都没有经费来源。结论  该市审方中心在运行和建设过程
          中,普遍存在经费短缺、协同激励机制缺乏和人手不足等问题。建议国家尽快出台审方中心建设的统一标准,各地卫生健康行政
          部门结合区域实际制定配套政策,明确考核指标。
          关键词  紧密型县域医共体;集中审方;云审方;审方中心;运行成本;绩效管理

          Research  on  the  current  situation  and  development  suggestions  of  centralized (cloud)  prescription  review
          center of the close-knit county-level medical consortium in a city
          HE Lu ,ZHU Mingyang ,HU Xiaolei ,QIAN Yan(1.  Dept.  of  Pharmacy,  the  Second  Affiliated  Hospital  of
                                            2
                1
                                1
                                                        1
          Chongqing  Medical  University,  Chongqing  400010,  China;2.  Dept.  of  Pharmacy,  Shapingba  Hospital,
          Chongqing University, Chongqing 401300, China)
          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE  To  investigate  the  actual  construction  and  operation  status  of  established  and  under-construction
          centralized (cloud)  prescription  review  centers (shortened  for “prescription  review  center”)  of  close-knit  county-level  medical
          consortium  in  a  certain  city,  so  as  to  provide  reference  for  improving  the  construction  quality  of  the  prescription  review  center.
          METHODS  An  online  questionnaire  survey  was  conducted  to  collect  the  data  from  51  established  and  under-construction
          prescription  review  center  in  the  city,  covering  basic  information,  funding  sources,  talent  management,  system  construction,
          review  rule  maintenance,  prescription  review  practices,  prescription  evaluation,  data  utilization,  and  current  challenges.  The
          collected data were summarized and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 51 valid questionnaires were retrieved, covering 32 established
          and  19  under-construction  prescription  review  center.  Among  the  32  established  prescription  review  centers,  the  main  funding
          sources  for  their  construction  came  from  government  financial  allocations,  accounting  for  56.25%.  Only  25.00%  of  prescription
          review  center  had  review  pharmacists  who  fully  met  national  qualification  requirements,  and  just  55.00%  updated  more  than  10
          review  rule  entries  per  month  on  average.  Outpatient  prescription  verification  realized  full  coverage,  but  37.50%  of  prescription
          review  centers  only  supported  rationality  verification  of  single  prescriptions,  and  50.00%  could  not  retrieve  laboratory  and
          examination results to assist in prescription review. Additionally, 40.62% of prescription review center had not regularly conducted
          prescription  evaluations  for  primary  care  institutions.  The  data  from  prescription  review  center  was  mainly  used  to  support
          medication monitoring. Among the 19 prescription review centers currently in the planning stage, 63.16% had no identified funding
                                                              sources.  CONCLUSIONS  The  operation  and  construction  of
              Δ 基金项目 国家临床重点专科建设项目(No.渝卫办发〔2023〕48             prescription  review  center  in  the  city  face  challenges,  such  as
          号);重庆市临床药学重点专科建设项目(No.渝卫办发〔2023〕2号)                 funding  shortages,  absence  of  collaborative  incentive
             *第一作者 主管药师,硕士。研究方向:临床药学。E-mail:
                                                              mechanisms, and insufficient manpower.It is suggested that the
          317248849@qq.com
              # 通信作者 主任药师,硕士生导师。研究方向:临床药学。                    state should issue a unified standard for the construction of the
          E-mail:552590989@qq.com                             prescription review center as soon as possible, and local health


          · 578 ·    China Pharmacy  2026 Vol. 37  No. 5                               中国药房  2026年第37卷第5期
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37