Page 108 - 《中国药房》2026年4期
P. 108

口服非肽类促血小板生成素受体激动剂对成年免疫性血小板减

          少症患者肝酶影响的Meta分析                                 Δ



          陆田田 ,沈 男,朱苏月,闫京京(徐州医科大学附属宿迁医院儿科,江苏 宿迁 223800)
                                        #
                *
          中图分类号  R973;R453.9      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2026)04-0510-06
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.04.17

          摘   要  目的  评价口服非肽类促血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RAs)对成年免疫性血小板减少症患者肝酶的影响。方法  检索
          PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据和中华医学期刊全文数据库,收集口服非肽类TPO-RAs(干预组)对比安慰剂或常规
          治疗(对照组)的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限为建库起至 2025 年 6 月。筛选文献、提取数据和评价纳入文献质量后,采用
          RevMan 5.4.1软件进行Meta分析。结果  共纳入12项RCT,总计1 388例患者,其中干预组971例,对照组417例。Meta分析结果
          显示,两组患者的肝酶升高发生率[OR=1.24,95%CI(0.77,1.99),P=0.37]、治疗时间≥6周的肝酶升高发生率[OR=1.21,95%CI
         (0.73,1.99),P=0.46]及重度肝酶升高发生率[OR=1.39,95%CI(0.46,4.20),P=0.55]比较,差异均无统计学意义。亚组分析结果
          显示,干预组中使用艾曲泊帕[OR=1.57,95%CI(0.85,2.87),P=0.15]、阿伐曲泊帕[OR=0.88,95%CI(0.09,8.46),P=0.91]和海曲
          泊帕[OR=1.04,95%CI(0.30,3.65),P=0.95]的患者肝酶升高发生率与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论  口服非肽类
          TPO-RAs不会显著增加成年免疫性血小板减少症患者的肝酶升高发生风险,且整体肝脏安全性良好。
          关键词  非肽类促血小板生成素受体激动剂;血小板减少症;肝酶;艾曲泊帕;阿伐曲泊帕;海曲泊帕


          Effects  of  oral  non-peptidic  thrombopoietin  receptor  agonists  on  hepatic  enzyme  in  adult  patients  with
          immune thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis
          LU Tiantian,SHEN Nan,ZHU Suyue,YAN Jingjing(Dept.  of  Pediatrics,  the  Affiliated  Suqian  Hospital  of
          Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu Suqian 223800, China)

          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE  To  systematically  evaluate  the  effects  of  oral  non-peptidic  thrombopoietin  receptor  agonists (TPO-

          RAs)  on  hepatic  enzyme  in  adult  patients  with  immune  thrombocytopenia.  METHODS  A  comprehensive  literature  search  was
          conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang database and the Chinese Medical Association Journal Full-Text Database
          to  collect  randomized  controlled  trials (RCTs)  comparing  oral  non-peptidic  TPO-RAs (intervention  group)  with  placebo  or
          conventional therapy (control group). All databases were searched from their inception to June 2025. After literature screening, data
          extraction  and  quality  assessment  of  the  included  studies,  meta-analysis  was  conducted  using  RevMan  5.4.1  software.  RESULTS
          Twelve  RCTs  comprising  1  388  patients  were  included,  with  971  in  the  intervention  group  and  417  in  the  control  group.  Meta-
          analysis  results  showed  that  there  were  no  significant  differences  between  the  two  groups  in  terms  of  the  incidence  of  hepatic
          enzyme elevation[OR=1.24, 95%CI (0.77, 1.99), P=0.37], the incidence of hepatic enzyme elevation in patients treated for ≥6
          weeks[OR=1.21, 95%CI (0.73, 1.99), P=0.46], and the incidence of severe hepatic enzyme elevation[OR=1.39, 95%CI(0.46,
          4.20), P=0.55]. Subgroup analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the incidence of hepatic enzyme elevation
          between  the  intervention  group  and  control  group  among  patients  using  eltrombopag[OR=1.57,95%CI(0.85,2.87),P=0.15],
          avatrombopag[OR=0.88,95%CI (0.09,8.46),P=0.91],  and  hetrombopag[OR=1.04,95%CI(0.30,3.65),  P=0.95],  respectively.
          CONCLUSIONS  Oral  non-peptidic  TPO-RAs  do  not  significantly  increase  the  risk  of  hepatic  enzyme  elevation  in  adult  patients
          with immune thrombocytopenia, and show an overall favorable hepatic safety profile.
          KEYWORDS     non-peptidic  thrombopoietin  receptor  agonists;  thrombocytopenia;  hepatic  enzyme;  eltrombopag;  avatrombopag;
                                                              hetrombopag
              Δ 基金项目 江苏省高校重点实验室开放课题(No.XZSYSKF-
          2024040);宿迁市科技计划项目(No.K202428)
             *第一作者 副主任医师,硕士。研究方向:内科疾病诊疗。                          免疫性血小板减少症(immune thrombocytopenia,
          E-mail:544681238@qq.com
                                                              ITP)是一种获得性自身免疫性疾病,发病率为0.003%~
              # 通信作者 副主任医师,硕士。研究方向:内科疾病诊疗。
          E-mail:gaosaneer@126.com                            0.004%,其特征是无明确病因出现血小板计数<100×


          · 510 ·    China Pharmacy  2026 Vol. 37  No. 4                               中国药房  2026年第37卷第4期
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113