Page 78 - 《中国药房》2025年9期
P. 78

相似人群的治疗效果,因此本研究对于临床疗效数据的                                 diabetes (SUSTAIN  8):a  double-blind,phase  3b,ran‐
          选择符合《中国药物经济学评价指南 2020》 的推荐。                              domised  controlled  trial[J].  Lancet  Diabetes  Endocrinol,
                                                [13]
          本研究中的成本、健康效用值及转移概率经敏感性分析                                 2019,7(11):834-844.
          证明,这些参数的改变并不会改变2种方案经济性评价                            [11]  ANTONIOU  M,MATEUS  C,HOLLINGSWORTH  B,
          的结局,不影响目前中国环境下对药物使用的决策价                                  et  al.  A  systematic  review  of  methodologies  used  in
          值。若能开展更多针对中国人群的大型临床研究以明                                  models  of  the  treatment  of  diabetes  mellitus[J].  Pharma-
                                                                   coeconomics,2024,42(1):19-40.
          确各治疗方案的有效性,将有助于进一步提高药物经济
                                                              [12]  高宁,冯冰,高胜男,等. 多格列艾汀联用治疗二甲双胍
          学研究的科学性,从而为医疗决策提供更严谨的证据。
                                                                   失效 2 型糖尿病患者的成本-效用分析[J]. 中国药房,
              综上所述,从中国卫生体系角度出发,相比于司美                               2024,35(6):724-728.
          格鲁肽+二甲双胍方案,卡格列净+二甲双胍方案用于二                           [13]  刘国恩 . 中国药物经济学评价指南 2020[M]. 北京:中国
          甲双胍血糖控制不佳的T2DM患者更具经济性。                                   市场出版社,2020:20-68.
          参考文献                                                [14]  张厚静,纪立伟. 钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂致不
          [ 1 ]  MAGLIANO  D  J,BOYKO  E  J.  IDF  diabetes  atlas[M].   良反应分析[J]. 中国药物警戒,2021,18(5):478-482.
               10th  ed.  Brussels:International  Diabetes  Federation,  [15]  司海娇,肇丽梅,蔡爽,等 . 胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动
               2021:14-15,57-59.                                   剂类药物用药指导:2023版[J]. 中国药房,2023,34(11):
          [ 2 ]  SUN H,SAEEDI P,KARURANGA S,et al. IDF diabetes    1281-1292.
               atlas:global,regional  and  country-level  diabetes  preva‐  [16]  谢泽宇,李梦婷,胡佳,等. 5种GLP-1RAs治疗二甲双胍
               lence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045[J]. Dia‐  控制不佳的2型糖尿病的成本-效用分析[J]. 中国药房,
               betes Res Clin Pract,2022,183:109119.               2024,35(6):718-723.
          [ 3 ]  中华医学会糖尿病学分会 . 中国糖尿病防治指南:2024                 [17]  WANG Y B,XU Y R,SHAN H T,et al. Health state uti-
               版[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2025,17(1):16-139.                    lity values of type 2 diabetes mellitus and related compli‐
          [ 4 ]  American  Diabetes  Association  Professional  Practice   cations:a  systematic  review  and  meta-regression[J].
               Committee.  Introduction  and  methodology:standards  of   Health Qual Life Outcomes,2024,22(1):74.
               care in diabetes:2024[J]. Diabetes Care,2024,47(Suppl.   [18]  TURNER R C,HOLMAN R R,STRATTON I M,et al.
               1):S1-S4.                                           Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin
          [ 5 ]  XIA L,SHEN T T,DONG W L,et al. Comparative effi‐  on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabe‐
               cacy and safety of 8 GLP-1RAs in patients with type 2 dia‐  tes: UKPDS 34[J]. Lancet,1998,352(9131):854-865.
               betes:a  network  meta-analysis[J].  Diabetes  Res  Clin   [19]  CLARK C M Jr. The burden of chronic hyperglycemia[J].
               Pract,2021,177:108904.                              Diabetes Care,1998,21(Suppl.3):C32-C34.
          [ 6 ]  TSAPAS  A,AVGERINOS  I,KARAGIANNIS  T,et  al.   [20]  马博乐,赵振宇. 基于Markov模型的聚乙二醇洛塞那肽
               Comparative  effectiveness  of  glucose-lowering  drugs  for   与二甲双胍联合治疗 2 型糖尿病的药物经济学评价[J].
               type  2  diabetes:a  systematic  review  and  network  meta-  中国医院药学杂志,2023,43(19):2194-2197,2207.
               analysis[J]. Ann Intern Med,2020,173(4):278-286.  [21]  BRIGGS  A,CLAXTON  K,SCULPHER  M.  Decision
          [ 7 ]  TSAPAS A,KARAGIANNIS T,KAKOTRICHI P,et al.        modelling  for  health  economic  evaluation[M].  Oxford:
               Comparative efficacy of glucose-lowering medications on   Oxford University Press,2006:839.
               body  weight  and  blood  pressure  in  patients  with  type  2   [22]  胡善联. 6年药价谈判回顾与改进建议[N]. 医药经济报,
               diabetes:a  systematic  review  and  network  meta-analysis  2024-01-26.
               [J]. Diabetes Obes Metab,2021,23(9):2116-2124.  [23]  HU S S,WANG S W,QI C D,et al. Cost-utility analysis
          [ 8 ]  DUAN X Y,LIU S Y,YIN D G. Comparative efficacy of   of  once-weekly  semaglutide,dulaglutide,and  exenatide
               5 sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and 7 glucagon-  for  type  2  diabetes  patients  receiving  metformin-based
               like peptide 1 receptor agonists interventions on cardiore‐  background therapy in China[J]. Front Pharmacol,2022,
               nal outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients:a network meta-  13:831364.
               analysis  based  on  cardiovascular  or  renal  outcome  trials  [24]  WU Z K,JIN T R,WENG J P. A thorough analysis of dia‐
               [J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2021,100(30):e26431.      betes  research  in  China  from  1995  to  2015:current  sce‐
          [ 9 ]  QIU M,DING L L,ZHOU H R. Comparative efficacy of   nario  and  future  scope[J].  Sci  China  Life  Sci,2019,62
               five  SGLT2i  on  cardiorenal  events:a  network  meta-  (1):46-62.
               analysis based on ten CVOTs[J]. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs,  [25]  陈洁,龙恩武,胡明. 糖尿病治疗指标的意愿支付调查及
               2022,22(1):69-81.                                   影响因素分析[J]. 中国药房,2016,27(18):2456-2460.
          [10]  LINGVAY I,CATARIG A M,FRIAS J P,et al. Efficacy             (收稿日期:2024-10-14  修回日期:2025-04-11)
               and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus daily cana‐                           (编辑:孙 冰)
               gliflozin  as  add-on  to  metformin  in  patients  with  type  2



          · 1092 ·    China Pharmacy  2025 Vol. 36  No. 9                              中国药房  2025年第36卷第9期
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83