Page 26 - 《中国药房》2024年19期
P. 26

我国医疗机构PIVAS医嘱审核情况调研分析
                                                                              Δ


                           2
                                   2
                                           3 #
                 1*
          赵 婧 ,孙路路 ,吕红梅 ,张建中 (1.复旦大学附属中山医院药剂科,上海 200032;2.国家卫生健康委医院
          管理研究所药事管理研究部,北京 100044;3.上海市老年医学中心药剂科,上海 201104)
          中图分类号  R952      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2024)19-2340-05
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.19.04

          摘   要  目的  了解全国医疗机构静脉用药调配中心(PIVAS)医嘱审核现状,进一步提升PIVAS医嘱管理水平,减少与杜绝静脉
          给药错误的发生。方法  通过问卷调研法,针对全国医疗机构PIVAS医嘱审核的问题和现状,由调研组中的各省(自治区、直辖市)
          专家负责组织本省份内相关医疗机构的 PIVAS 负责人填写医嘱审核和不适宜医嘱干预情况的问卷,并对结果进行统计分析。
          结果  共收到关于PIVAS医嘱审核的有效问卷751份。我国PIVAS医嘱审核主要以人工与计算机相结合的方式进行。PIVAS每
          日医嘱审核条数的中位数为 700.00~771.00 条;每日新增医嘱审核条数的中位数为 209.68~215.00 条;平均医嘱审核率为
          85.50%~92.44%;不适宜医嘱平均占比为 1.82%~1.89%;不适宜医嘱平均干预率为 74.90%~79.41%,平均干预成功率为
          79.62%~87.28%;退药率为2.92%~3.08%。结论  我国大部分医疗机构PIVAS的医嘱审核采用审方软件辅助,个别PIVAS存在医
          嘱不审核、不适宜医嘱不干预等情况,医嘱审核的标准及流程有待完善。建议强调药师审方责任制,规范化使用审方软件,逐步扩
          大医嘱审核范围,并采用多部门协作方式,从而提高不适宜医嘱的干预成功率、降低PIVAS退药率。
          关键词  静脉用药调配中心;医嘱审核;审方软件


          Investigation and analysis of the medical prescription approval in PIVAS in China
          ZHAO Jing ,SUN Lulu ,LYU Hongmei ,ZHANG Jianzhong(1.  Dept.  of  Pharmacy,  Zhongshan  Hospital,
                                               2
                     1
                                2
                                                                  3
          Fudan  University,  Shanghai  200032,  China;2.  Dept.  of  Pharmaceutical  Administration  Research,  National
          Institute  of  Hospital  Administration,  National  Health  Commission,  Beijing  100044,  China;3.  Dept.  of
          Pharmacy, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Shanghai 201104, China)

          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE To know about the current status of medical order auditing in pharmacy intravenous admixture service
         (PIVAS)  of  medical  institutions  nationwide,  further  improve  the  management  of  medical  orders  in  PIVAS,  and  reduce  and
          eliminate the occurrence of intravenous medication administration errors. METHODS Through the questionnaire survey method, to
          address  the  problems  and  current  situation  of  PIVAS  medical  order  auditing  in  medical  institutions  nationwide,  experts  from  each
          province (autonomous  region,  municipality  directly  under  the  central  government)  in  the  research  group  were  responsible  for
          organizing the PIVAS directors of relevant medical institutions in their provinces to fill in the questionnaires on medical order audit
          and  inappropriate  medical  order  interventions,  and  conduct  a  statistical  analysis  of  the  results.  RESULTS  A  total  of  valid  751
          responses  were  received  to  the  PIVAS  questionnaire  on  the  review  of  medical  prescriptions.  Our  PIVAS  medical  order  audit  is
          mainly  carried  out  by  a  combination  of  manual  and  computer.  The  median  number  of  medical  orders  were  audited  by  PIVAS  per
          day  were  700.00-771.00;  the  median number  of  new  medical orders  were  audited by  PIVAS  per  day  were  209.68-215.00;  medical
          order  auditing  rates  were  85.50%-92.44%  averagely;  the  inappropriate  doctor’s  orders  accounted  for  1.82%-1.89%  averagely;  the
          intervention  rates  of  inappropriate  medical  orders  ranged  74.90%-79.41%,  the  success  rates  of  intervention  were  79.62%-87.28%
          averagely;  the  medication  refund  rates  were  2.92%-3.08%.  CONCLUSIONS  Most  of  the  PIVAS  in  China’s  healthcare  institutions
                                                              use  medical  order  review  software  to  assist  in  the  review  of

              Δ 基金项目 国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所横向项目(No.                   medical  orders,  and  there  are  cases  of  individual  PIVAS  in
          202207200959000030162);中国药师协会项目:静脉用药调配中心工           which  medical  orders  are  not  reviewed  comprehensively  and
          作调研(No.国药协函〔2022〕34号)                               inappropriate  orders  are  not  intervened  in,  and  the  standards
             * 第一作者 主 管 药 师 。 研 究 方 向 :静 配 药 学 。 电 话 :021-
                                                              and  processes  of  medical  prescription  review  need  to  be
          64041990。E-mail:zhao.jing1@zs-hospital.sh.cn
              #  通信作者 主 任 药 师 。 研 究 方 向 :静 配 药 学 。 电 话 :021-  improved.  It  is  recommended  to  emphasize  the  pharmacist’s
          51371990。E-mail:20792358@qq.com                     responsibility  system,  standardize  the  use  of  prescription


          · 2340 ·    China Pharmacy  2024 Vol. 35  No. 19                            中国药房  2024年第35卷第19期
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31