Page 107 - 《中国药房》2023年14期
P. 107

儿童轮状病毒感染治疗药物随机对照试验设计的系统评价



                *
                                 #
          高石曼 ,刘 畅,闫美兴(青岛大学附属妇女儿童医院/青岛市妇女儿童医院临床药学科,山东 青岛 266034)
          中图分类号  R978.7      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2023)14-1761-07
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.14.19

          摘  要  目的  系统分析儿童轮状病毒感染治疗药物的相关临床研究,为提升临床试验实施过程的科学性和规范性提供参考。
          方法  系统检索PubMed、the Cochrane Library和Embase数据库,纳入2000-2022年发表的儿童轮状病毒感染治疗药物随机对照
          试验(RCT)的英文文献。筛选文献、提取资料后,采用 Cochrane 系统评价员手册推荐的偏倚评价量表对纳入文献进行质量评
          价,对其研究目的、试验设计、受试者的选择与退出、干预措施、疗程、随访、有效性与安全性评价、试验结果等进行描述性分析。
          结果与结论  共纳入17项RCT,共计1 345例儿童受试者。研究目的包括缓解轮状病毒感染引起的腹泻发作,促进粪便中轮状病
          毒脱落,改善脱水、发热、呕吐等临床症状,缩短住院时间等;所有研究均采用随机方法,均为单中心研究,多采用双盲设计(13项)
          和安慰剂对照(16项),且64.71%的研究有样本量估算;受试者的纳入与排除标准涉及腹泻发作情况、病毒检测情况、临床症状、病
          种、试验用药物等;干预措施包括益生菌(8项)、生物制剂(3项)、抗感染药(3项)等,疗程以1~5 d为主(13项);58.82%的研究设
          计了随访;有效性评价主要针对腹泻发作情况,微生物学试验和粪便培养结果,脱水、发热及呕吐等临床症状,住院时间或症状持
          续时间等,指标评价标准包括Vesikari量表、WHO推荐标准及研究者相关记录等;有10项研究对不良事件/不良反应进行了观察;
          仅有1项研究列出了伦理批件号。纳入研究的文献信息涵盖了儿童轮状病毒感染治疗药物RCT设计的基本要素,但均为单中心
          研究,部分研究缺乏样本量估算依据及基础治疗之外的合并用药情况,质量有待提升。今后应进一步开展高质量的多中心临床试
          验,以客观测量指标为主要有效性结果,并重视伦理审查和药物安全性评价。
          关键词  轮状病毒感染;儿童;随机对照试验;设计要素

          Systematic  review  on  the  design  of  randomized  controlled  trials  about  therapeutic  drugs  for  rotavirus
          infection in children
          GAO Shiman,LIU Chang,YAN Meixing(Dept.  of  Clinical  Pharmacy,  Women  and  Children’s  Hospital,
          Qingdao University/Qingdao Women and Children’s Hospital, Shandong Qingdao 266034, China)

          ABSTRACT   OBJECTIVE  To  systematically  analyze  the  related  clinical  research  of  therapeutic  drugs  for  rotavirus  infection  in
          children,  and  to  provide  reference  for  the  improvement  of  scientific  and  normative  implementation  in  clinical  trials.  METHODS
          PubMed,  the  Cochrane  Library  and  Embase  databases  were  systematically  searched,  and  English  literature  on  randomized
          controlled  trials (RCTs)  about  therapeutic  drugs  for  pediatric  rotavirus  infection  published  between  2000  and  2022  was  included.
          After  literature  screening  and  data  extraction,  the  quality  of  the  included  literature  was  evaluated  using  the  bias  risk  assessment
          scale recommended by Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The research objectives, overall design, subject inclusion and
          exclusion  criteria,  interventions,  course  of  treatment,  follow-up  visits,  efficacy  and  safety  evaluations,  and  results  were  analyzed
          descriptively.  RESULTS  &  CONCLUSIONS  A  total  of  17  RCTs  were  included,  involving  1  345  subjects.  The  purpose  included
          relieving  rotavirus  infection-induced  diarrhea,  promoting  rotaviral  shedding,  improving  clinical  symptoms  such  as  dehydration,
          fever,  vomiting,  and  shortening  hospital  stays,  etc. All  trials  were  randomized  and  single-center  studies,  mostly  double-blind (13
          trials)  and  placebo-controlled (16  trials),  and  64.71%  had  sample  size  estimation.  The  inclusion  and  exclusion  criteria  included
          diarrhea attack, virus detection, clinical symptoms, disease types and drugs, etc. The interventions included probiotics (8 trials),
          biological  agents (3  trials),  anti-infective  agents (3  trials),  etc.  Most  of  treatment  course  was  1-5  days (13  trials).  A  total  of
          58.82%  were  designed  for  follow-up.  In  the  validity  evaluation,  diarrhea  attack,  microbiology  test  and  fecal  culture,  clinical
          symptoms such as dehydration, fever and vomiting, length of hospital stays or duration of symptoms were included. Vesikari scale,
          WHO  criteria  and  researcher  evaluation  were  the  evaluation  criteria.  In  the  safety  evaluation,  10  trials  were  designed  for  adverse
          events/adverse  reaction  observation;  only  one  trial  listed  ethical  approval  numbers.  The  information  of  literature  included  in  the
          study  covers  the  basic  elements  for  the  design  of  RCTs  of  drugs  for  rotavirus  infection  in  children.  Nevertheless,  all  are  single-
          center  studies.  Partial  studies  lack  the  basis  for  sample  size  estimation  and  related  contents  of  drug  combination,  and  the  quality
          needs  to  be  improved.  In  the  future,  the  high-quality  multi-center  clinical  trials  should  be  further  conducted,  with  objective
                                                             measurement  indexes  as  the  validity  results,  and  the  ethical
             *第一作者 主管药师,博士。研究方向:中药及其复方药效物质
                                                             review and safety evaluation should be emphasized.
          基础、临床药学。E-mail:gaoshiman151@163.com
             # 通信作者 主任药师,硕士。研究方向:医院药学管理、临床药                  KEYWORDS     rotavirus  infection;  children;  randomized
          学。E-mail:meixing@163.com                           controlled trials; design elements


          中国药房  2023年第34卷第14期                                              China Pharmacy  2023 Vol. 34  No. 14    · 1761 ·
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112