Page 105 - 《中国药房》2023年6期
P. 105

·循证药学·


          伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流有效性和安全性的Meta分析                                                          Δ


                *
          唐嘉曦 ,国梦然,樊天斐,王治丹,占 美,郑明琳,樊 萍(四川大学华西医院临床药学部,成都 610041)
                                                              #
          中图分类号  R975      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2023)06-0735-06
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.06.18

          摘  要  目的  评价伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流(GERD)的有效性和安全性,为临床用药提供循证依据。方法  计算机检索
          PubMed、the Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据、维普网和中国生物医学文献数据库,收集伏诺拉生(试验组)
          对比安慰剂或质子泵抑制剂(对照组)的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限为建库起至2022年6月。筛选文献、提取资料后采用Co‐
          chrane系统评价员手册5.1.0推荐的偏倚评估工具对纳入文献质量进行评价;采用RevMan 5.4软件进行Meta分析、敏感性分析和
          发表偏倚分析。结果  共纳入 9 项 RCT,共计 1 882 例患者。Meta 分析结果显示,试验组患者的总体有效率[OR=1.94,95%CI
         (1.45,2.58),P<0.000 01]、治愈率[OR=2.27,95%CI(1.33,3.86),P=0.003]、缓解率[OR=1.81,95%CI(1.28,2.55),P=0.000 7]均
          显著高于对照组;两组患者的药物不良事件发生率及腹泻、鼻咽炎、上呼吸道感染、碱性磷酸酶升高发生率比较,差异均无统计学
          意义(P>0.05)。亚组分析结果显示,治疗2周时,试验组患者的治愈率显著高于对照组(P<0.05);治疗4、8周时,两组患者的治
          愈率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。洛杉矶分级A/B级患者中,两组患者治疗2、4、8周时的治愈率比较,差异均无统计学
          意义(P>0.05);洛杉矶分级C/D级患者中,试验组患者治疗2、4、8周时的治愈率均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。敏感性分析和发
          表偏倚分析结果显示,本研究所得结果稳健且存在发表偏倚的可能性较小。结论  伏诺拉生治疗 GERD 的有效性和安全性均
          较好。
          关键词  伏诺拉生;胃食管反流;有效性;安全性;Meta分析


          Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis
          TANG Jiaxi,GUO Mengran,FAN Tianfei,WANG Zhidan,ZHAN Mei,ZHENG Minglin,FAN Ping(Dept.  of
          Pharmacy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China)

          ABSTRACT   OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal
          reflux  disease,  and  to  provide  evidence-based  reference  for  clinical  drug  use.  METHODS  Randomized  controlled  trials (RCTs)
          about  vonoprazan (trial  group)  versus  placebo  or  proton  pump  inhibitor (control  group)  were  searched  in  PubMed,  the  Cochrane
          Library,  Web  of  Science,  CNKI,  Wanfang,  VIP  and  CBM  databases  from  the  inception  to  June,  2022. After  literature  screening
          and data extraction, the qualities of included literature were evaluated with bias assessment tool recommended by Cochrane system
          evaluator  manual  5.1.0.  Meta-analysis,  sensitivity  analysis  and  publication  bias  analysis  were  conducted  by  using  RevMan  5.4
          software.  RESULTS  A  total  of  9  RCTs  were  included,  involving  1  882  patients.  The  results  of  meta-analysis  showed  that:  total
          response rate [OR=1.94,95%CI(1.45,2.58),P<0.000 01], cure rate [OR=2.27,95%CI(1.33,3.86),P=0.003] and remission rate
          [OR=1.81,95%CI(1.28,  2.55),  P=0.000  7]  of  trial  group  were  significantly  higher  than  control  group;  there  was  no  significant
          difference  in  the  incidence  of  adverse  drug  events,  diarrhea,  nasopharyngitis,  upper  respiratory  tract  infection  and  alkaline
          phosphatase  elevation  between  two  groups (P>0.05).  The  results  of  subgroup  analysis  showed  that  cure  rate  of  trial  group  was
          significantly higher than control group at 2 weeks of treatment (P<0.05); at 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, there was no significant
          difference in the cure rate between two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the cure rate between
          two groups at 2, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment among the patients with Los Angeles grade A/B (P>0.05); among the patients with
          Los Angeles grade C/D, the cure rate of patients in the trial group was significantly higher than control group at 2, 4 and 8 weeks
          of  treatment (P<0.05).  The  results  of  sensitivity  analysis  and  publication  bias  analysis  showed  that  the  results  of  this  study  were
                                                             robust  and  the  possibility  of  publication  bias  was  small.
             Δ 基金项目 四川省区域创新合作项目(No.2020YFQ0010)
                                                             CONCLUSIONS  Vonoprazan  has  a  considerable  effectiveness
             * 第一作者 药 师 ,硕 士 。 研 究 方 向 :医 院 药 学 。 电 话 :028-
          85422096。E-mail:395358440@qq.com                   and safety in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
             #  通信作者 副主任药师。研究方向:医院药学。电话:028-                 KEYWORDS     vonoprazan;  gastroesophageal  reflux  disease;
          85422096。E-mail:825370320@qq.com                   effectiveness; safety; meta-analysis


          中国药房  2023年第34卷第6期                                                 China Pharmacy  2023 Vol. 34  No. 6    · 735 ·
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110