Page 47 - 《中国药房》2022年24期
P. 47

不同干燥加工方式的白芷饮片质量评价
                                                                       Δ


                                               1, 2
                                                                           1, 2
                                                                                             1, 2 #
                                     1, 2
                                                        1, 2
                                                                  1, 2
                           1, 2
          朱兴龙    1, 2* ,陈晓妍 ,晏宇杭 ,吴清华 ,卢丽洁 ,黄旭龙 ,张佳旭 ,郑全林 ,裴 瑾 (1.成都中医药
                                                                                     3
          大学药学院,成都 611137;2.西南特色中药资源国家重点实验室,成都 611137;3.遂宁天地网川白芷产业有
          限公司,四川 遂宁 629000)
          中图分类号  R917      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2022)24-2985-05
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.24.08
          摘  要  目的  评价不同干燥加工方式的白芷饮片质量。方法  采用Adobe Photoshop 2020软件测定烘干蒸切、鲜切干燥、半鲜切
          干燥3种不同干燥方式所得白芷饮片的红绿度(a)、黄蓝度(b)、明度(L)值;采用高效液相色谱法测定3种不同干燥方式白芷饮片
          中伞形花内酯等9种香豆素类成分的含量;采用SPSS 26.00软件和SIMCA 14.0软件对32批白芷饮片中9种香豆素类成分含量进
          行主成分分析和偏最小二乘法-判别分析,采用灰色关联度分析饮片粉末颜色和香豆素类成分含量的关联性。结果  32批白芷饮
          片粉末的a、b、L值分别为0~2.4、6.0~20.3、35.6~51.1。伞形花内酯、白当归素、补骨脂素、花椒毒素、佛手柑内酯、氧化前胡素、
          欧前胡素、珊瑚菜素、异欧前胡素的含量分别为 0.026~0.324、0.051~0.549、0~0.113、0~0.398、0.256~1.115、1.434~6.014、
          1.866~4.039、0.742~1.455、0.789~2.642 mg/g,总含量为 6.442~13.382 mg/g。主成分分析结果显示,半鲜切干燥饮片(BZ-27~
          BZ-30、BZ-32)的综合得分排序靠前,其余两种饮片质量差异较大。偏最小二乘法-判别分析结果显示,半鲜切干燥饮片聚为一类,
          烘干蒸切饮片和鲜切干燥饮片分离度较差。灰色关联度分析结果显示,L、b值与佛手柑内酯、氧化前胡素、欧前胡素、珊瑚菜素、
          异欧前胡素及b值与补骨脂素的关联系数均大于0.8,a值与各成分的关联度较低。结论  白芷饮片的外观性状与香豆素类成分含
          量具有较强关联性,可通过颜色大致判断饮片质量,即颜色较白的饮片质量较好;半鲜切干燥饮片质量优于烘干蒸切饮片和鲜切
          干燥饮片。
          关键词  白芷饮片;干燥方法;外观性状;香豆素类成分;高效液相色谱法;质量评价


          Quality evaluation of Angelica dahurica decoction pieces processed by different drying methods
                                                                                1, 2
                                                                                                  1, 2
                                                       1, 2
                                                                     1, 2
                       1, 2
                                        1, 2
          ZHU Xinglong ,CHEN Xiaoyan ,YAN Yuhang ,WU Qinghua ,LU Lijie ,HUANG Xulong ,ZHANG
                                 3
          Jiaxu ,ZHENG Quanlin ,PEI Jin (1.  School  of  Pharmacy,  Chengdu  University  of  Traditional  Chinese
                                          1, 2
              1, 2
          Medicine,  Chengdu  611137,  China;2.  State  Key  Laboratory  of  Southwestern  Chinese  Medicine  Resources,
          Chengdu 611137, China;3. Suining Tiandiwang Angelica anomala Industry Co., Ltd., Sichuan Suining 629000,
          China)
          ABSTRACT   OBJECTIVE  To evaluate the quality of Angelica dahurica decoction pieces processed by different drying methods.
          METHODS  Adobe  Photoshop  2020  software  was  used  to  determine  the  red  green  degree (a),  yellow  blue  degree (b)  and
          brightness (L) values of A. dahurica decoction pieces processed by 3 drying methods as steamed-cut and fresh-cut-dried, and semi-
          fresh-cut-dried.  The  contents  of  nine  coumarins  such  as  umbelliferone  in  A.  dahurica  decoction  pieces  processed  by  3  drying
          methods  were  determined  by  HPLC.  SPSS  26.00  software  and  SIMCA14.0  software  were  used  to  conduct  principal  component
          analysis  and  partial  least  squares-discriminant  analysis  on  the  content  of  coumarin  in  32  batches  of A.  dahurica  decoction  pieces.
          Gray  correlation  analysis  was  conducted  on  the  color  of  the  powder  and  the  coumarins  contents  in A.  dahurica  decoction  pieces.
          RESULTS  The  a,  b  and  L  were  0-2.4,  6.0-20.3  and  35.6-51.1  in  32  batches  of  A.  dahurica  decoction  pieces.  The  contents  of
          umbelliferone,  byakangelicin,  psoralen,  xanthotoxin,  bergapten,  oxypeucedanin,  imperatorin,  phellopterin  and  isoimperatorin
          were  0.026-0.324,  0.051-0.549,  0-0.113,  0-0.398,  0.256-1.115,  1.434-6.014,  1.866-4.039,  0.742-1.455  and  0.789-2.642  mg/g,
          respectively. And the total content ranged 6.442-13.382 mg/g, respectively. The results of principal component analysis showed that
          the  comprehensive  scores  of  BZ-27-BZ-30  and  BZ-32  batches  of  semi-fresh-cut-dried  decoction  pieces  were  in  the  top  order,  and
          the  internal  quality  of  the  other  two  kinds  of  decoction  pieces  was  quite  different.  The  results  of  partial  least  squares  discriminant
          analysis  showed  that  semi-fresh-cut-dried  decoction  pieces  were  clustered  into  one  category,  poor  separation  was  observed  in
                                                             steamed-cut  and  fresh-cut-dried  decoction  pieces.  Results  of
             Δ 基金项目 四川省科技计划项目(No.2022YFS0582,2020YFN-
                                                             gray  correlation  analysis  showed  that  the  correlation
          0152);四川省中医药重点学科建设项目
                                                             coefficients  of  L  and  b  with  bergapten,  oxypeucedanin,
             *第一作者 硕士研究生。 研究方向:中药资源开发利用与评价 。
          E-mail:798698365@qq.com                            imperatorin,  phellopterin,  isoimperatorin  and  b  with  psoralen
             # 通信作者 教授,硕士生导师,博士。研究方向:中药资源开发利                 were  all  greater  than  0.8,  a  had  a  low  correlation  with  all
          用与评价。E-mail:peixjin@163.com                        components.  CONCLUSIONS  The  appearance  traits  of  A.


          中国药房  2022年第33卷第24期                                              China Pharmacy  2022 Vol. 33  No. 24    · 2985 ·
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52