Page 121 - 《中国药房》2022年11期
P. 121

criteria decision analysis in health care:a systematic  Dis,2017,12(1):10.
             review and bibliometric analysis[J]. Health Expect,2015,  [18]  BALTUSSEN R,STOLK E,CHISHOLM D,et al. To-
             18(6):1894-1905.                                   wards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting:an ap-
        [ 7 ]  DIABY V,CAMPBELL K,GOEREE R. Multi-criteria      plication to Ghana[J]. Health Econ,2006,15(7):689-696.
             decision analysis(MCDA)in health care:a bibliometric  [19]  BALTUSSEN R,NIESSEN L. Priority setting of health
             analysis[J]. Oper Res Heal Care,2013,2(1/2):20-24.  interventions:the need for multi-criteria decision analysis
        [ 8 ]  KHANGURA S,KONNYU K,CUSHMAN R,et al. Evi-        [J]. Cost Eff Resour Alloc,2006,4:14.
             dence summaries:the evolution of a rapid review ap-  [20]  FREITES-MARTINEZ A,SANTANA N,ARIAS-SANTIAGO
             proach[J]. Syst Rev,2012,1:10.                     S,et al. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for
        [ 9 ]  GOETGHEBEUR M M,WAGNER M,KHOURY H,et al.         Adverse Events(CTCAE - version 5.0)to evaluate the
             Evidence and value:impact on decision making:the   severity of adverse events of anticancer therapies[J]. Actas
             EVIDEM framework and potential applications[J]. BMC  Dermosifiliogr(Engl Ed),2021,112(1):90-92.
             Health Serv Res,2008,8:270.                   [21]  KIM E S,HIRSH V,MOK T,et al. Gefitinib versus
        [10]  GOETGHEBEUR M M,WAGNER M,KHOURY H,                docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer
             et al. Bridging Health Technology Assessment(HTA)and  (INTEREST):a randomised phase Ⅲ trial[J]. Lancet,
             efficient health care decision making with Multicriteria  2008,372(9652):1809-1818.
             Decision Analysis (MCDA):applying the EVIDEM  [22]  WU Y L,SAIJO N,THONGPRASERT S,et al. Efficacy
             framework to medicines appraisal[J]. Med Decis Making,  according to blind independent central review:post-hoc
             2012,32(2):376-388.                                analyses from the phase Ⅲ ,randomized,multicenter,
        [11]  GOETGHEBEUR M M,CELLIER M S. Can reflective       IPASS study of first-line gefitinib versus carboplatin/pacli-
             multicriteria be the new paradigm for healthcare deci-  taxel in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive ad-
             sion-making? The EVIDEM journey[J]. Cost Eff Resour  vanced NSCLC[J]. Lung Cancer,2017,104:119-125.
             Alloc,2018,16(Suppl 1):54.                    [23]  YANG Y P,MA Y X,HUANG Y,et al. QoL analyses
        [12]  戴泽琦,徐思敏,吴雪,等. EVIDEM 框架介绍及其在卫                     from INFORM study,a phase Ⅲ study of gefitinib versus
             生决策中的应用[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(4):                   placebo as maintenance therapy in advanced NSCLC[J].
             212-218.                                           Sci Rep,2015,5:11934.
        [13]  MORENO-CALDERÓN A,TONG T S,THOKALA P.        [24]  SIM E H A,YANG I A,FONG K,et al. Gefitinib for
             Multi-criteria decision analysis software in healthcare pri-  advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J/OL]. Cochrane
             ority setting:a systematic review[J]. Pharmacoeconomics,  Database Syst Rev,2007[2022-01-01]. https://www.co-
             2020,38(3):269-283.                                chranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006847/
        [14]  KARRER L,ZHANG S X,KÜHLEIN T,et al. Exploring     full.
             physicians and patients’perspectives for current interven-  [25]  胡巧织,占美,吴斌,等.吉非替尼一线用于晚期非小细胞
             tions on thyroid nodules using a MCDA method[J]. Cost  肺癌精准治疗的 Meta 分析[J].华西医学,2018,33(1):
             Eff Resour Alloc,2021,19(1):26.                    60-66.
        [15]  NASSER S C,ADERIAN S S,KHOURY H,et al. Multi-  [26]  HOLLEMAN M S,AL M J,ZAIM R,et al. Cost-effective-
             ple criteria decision analysis for medicine reimbursement  ness analysis of the first-line EGFR-TKIs in patients with
             in the Lebanese context[J]. Int J Technol Assess Heal  non-small cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations
             Care,2021,37:e69.                                  [J]. Eur J Health Econ,2020,21(1):153-164.
        [16]  ANGELIS A,KANAVOS P. Multiple Criteria Decision  [27]  骆少红,董凉凉,李逸元,等.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(吉非替
             Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in    尼、厄洛替尼、阿法替尼和奥希替尼)一线治疗表皮生长
             Health Technology Assessment and beyond:the advance  因子受体突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本-效果分析
             value framework[J]. Soc Sci Med,2017,188:137-156.  (英文)[J]. J Chin Pharm Sci,2021,30(3):253-263.
        [17]  SCHEY C,KRABBE P F,POSTMA M J,et al. Multi-Cri-             (收稿日期:2022-01-13  修回日期:2022-05-05)
             teria Decision Analysis (MCDA):testing a proposed                                  (编辑:刘明伟)
             MCDA framework for orphan drugs[J]. Orphanet J Rare








        中国药房    2022年第33卷第11期                                             China Pharmacy 2022 Vol. 33 No. 11  ·1391 ·
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126