Page 72 - 《中国药房》2022年6期
P. 72

指纹图谱、多成分定量分析及化学模式识别分析相结合的心安胶

        囊质量评价             Δ


                                2
                                                         1
                                                 1
                                         1
               1*
                                                                 1 #
                        1
        李艳荣 ,杜义龙 ,沈 莹 ,吴 哲 ,王狄鑫 ,赵胜男 ,潘海峰 (1.承德医学院中药研究所/河北省中药研究与
        开发重点实验室,河北 承德 067000;2.承德御室金丹药业有限公司,河北 承德 068150)
        中图分类号 R286.0          文献标志码 A          文章编号 1001-0408(2022)06-0706-07
        DOI   10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.06.10
        摘   要   目的 建立指纹图谱、多成分定量分析和化学模式识别分析相结合的心安胶囊质量评价方法。方法 采用高效液相色谱
        (HPLC)法,结合《中药色谱指纹图谱相似度评价系统(2012版)》建立24批心安胶囊的指纹图谱,并进行相似度评价,确定共有峰;
        采用同一HPLC法测定心安胶囊中牡荆素葡萄糖苷、牡荆素鼠李糖苷、牡荆素、金丝桃苷和异槲皮素的含量;以指纹图谱共有峰峰
        面积为变量,采用MetaboAnalyst 5.0工具绘制聚类分析(CA)热图,采用SIMCA 14.1软件进行主成分分析(PCA)和偏最小二乘法-
        判别分析(PLS-DA)。结果 24批心安胶囊共有12个共有峰,相似度均大于0.97;指认出绿原酸、牡荆素葡萄糖苷、牡荆素鼠李糖
        苷、牡荆素、金丝桃苷和异槲皮素6个共有峰。牡荆素葡萄糖苷、牡荆素鼠李糖苷、牡荆素、金丝桃苷、异槲皮素检测质量浓度的线
        性范围分别为2.36~151.35、9.15~585.20、1.20~76.50、0.68~43.20、0.44~27.90 µg/mL(r均大于0.999);精密度、重复性、稳定性(24
        h)试验的 RSD 均小于 2.00%;平均加样回收率分别为 95.80%(RSD=0.96%,n=6)、102.10%(RSD=0.93%,n=6)、103.26%
        (RSD=1.28%,n=6)、103.89%(RSD=0.73%,n=6)、102.09%(RSD=1.79%,n=6)。5 种成分的含量分别为 0.988 8~1.559 1、
        4.336 6~11.220 1、0.065 1~0.830 5、0.043 8~0.692 5、0.023 2~0.427 2 mg/粒。CA、PCA 结果显示,24 批样品可分成 3 类,S1~
        S15为一类,S16~S18为一类,S19~S24为一类;PLS-DA发现,6号峰对应成分和牡荆素葡萄糖苷(7号峰)、牡荆素鼠李糖苷(8号
        峰)、金丝桃苷(10号峰)、异槲皮素(11号峰)的变量重要性投影值均大于1。结论 所建立的HPLC指纹图谱、多成分定量方法简
        单、可行,结合化学模式识别分析可用于心安胶囊的质量控制;牡荆素葡萄糖苷、牡荆素鼠李糖苷等可能是影响各批样品质量的差
        异标志物。
        关键词 心安胶囊;高效液相色谱法;指纹图谱;多成分定量分析;聚类分析;主成分分析;偏最小二乘法-判别分析;质量控制

        Quality evaluation of Xin’an capsules by combination of fingerprint, multi-component quantitative
        analysis and chemical pattern recognition analysis
                                         2
        LI Yanrong ,DU Yilong ,SHEN Ying ,WU Zhe ,WANG Dixin ,ZHAO Shengnan ,PAN Haifeng(1. Institute of
                                                                                              1
                  1
                             1
                                                                1
                                                                                 1
                                                   1
        Traditional Chinese Medicine/Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research and Development of
        Hebei Province,Chengde Medical University,Hebei Chengde 067000,China;2. Chengde Yushi Jindan
        Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.,Hebei Chengde 068150,China)
        ABSTRACT     OBJECTIVE To establish a method for quality evaluation of Xin’an capsule by combining fingerprint,
        multi-component quantitative analysis and chemical pattern recognition analysis. METHODS High performance liquid
        chromatography (HPLC) combined with Similarity Evaluation System of TCM Chromatogram Fingerprint (2012 edition) were
        used to establish the fingerprints of 24 batches of Xin’an capsules and evaluate the similarity. The common peaks were determined.
        The contents of glucosylvitexin,rhamnosylvitexin,vitexin,hyperoside and isoquercetin in Xin’an capsules were determined by the
        same HPLC method. Taking the common peak area of fingerprint as the variable,MetaboAnalyst 5.0 tool was used to draw the
        cluster analysis(CA)heat map. SIMCA 14.1 software was used to perform principle component analysis(PCA)and partial least
        squares-discriminant analysis(PLS-DA). RESULTS Twelve common peaks were identified with the similarity greater than 0.97.
        Six common peaks were identified as chlorogenic acid,glucosylvitexin,rhamnosylvitexin,vitexin,hyperoside and isoquercetin.
                                                            The linear range of glucosylvitexin,rhamnosylvitexin,vitexin,
            Δ 基金项目:河北省重点研发计划项目(No.20372507D);河北省
                                                            hyperoside and isoquercetin were 2.36-151.35,9.15-585.20,
        科技厅“技术创新引导专项-科技工作会商”项目;河北省高校重点学
                                                            1.20-76.50, 0.68-43.20, 0.44-27.90 µg/mL(all r>0.999).
        科建设项目(No.冀教高〔2013〕4号)
            *副教授,硕士。研究方向:中药分析。E-mail:liyanrong00001@        RSDs of precision,repeatability and stability(24 h)tests were
        163.com                                             all less than 2.00% . The average recoveries were 95.80%
            # 通信作者:教授,硕士生导师。研究方向:中药质量评价及中药                 (RSD=0.96% ,n=6),102.10% (RSD=0.93% ,n=6),
        配方颗粒。电话:0314-2291186。E-mail:phf2301@163.com         103.26%(RSD=1.28%,n=6),103.89%(RSD=0.73%,n=6)


        ·706 ·  China Pharmacy 2022 Vol. 33 No. 6                                    中国药房    2022年第33卷第6期
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77