Page 25 - 2020年21期
P. 25

穿膜肽 GGPFV 修饰的柔红霉素/薯蓣皂苷脂质体的处方优化及

        细胞毒性研究               Δ


              *
        姚雪敏 ,荆 鸣,蔡馥伊,孔 亮,李学涛(辽宁中医药大学药学院,辽宁 大连 116600)
                                             #
        中图分类号 R283.6         文献标志码 A           文章编号 1001-0408(2020)21-2579-06
        DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2020.21.04

        摘  要   目的:制备穿膜肽GGPFV修饰的柔红霉素/薯蓣皂苷脂质体,对其处方进行优化,并初步评价其对乳腺癌细胞的体外毒
        性。方法:采用薄膜分散法和硫酸铵水化法,将柔红霉素和薯蓣皂苷包载其中,在表面以聚乙二醇-二硬脂酰基磷脂酰乙醇胺2000
       (DSPE-PEG2000 )-GGPFV修饰,制备GGPFV修饰的柔红霉素/薯蓣皂苷脂质体。以包封率为指标,采用Box-Behnken响应面法优化
        处方中水化体积、胆固醇用量和柔红霉素用量;测定按最优处方制备的 3 批脂质体的包封率。比较柔红霉素/薯蓣皂苷脂质体、
        GGPFV修饰的柔红霉素/薯蓣皂苷脂质体和空白脂质体作用后对人乳腺癌MDA-MB-435S细胞存活率的影响。结果:最优处方为
        水化体积 5 mL、胆固醇 4 mg、蛋黄卵磷脂 22 mg、柔红霉素 0.55 mg、薯蓣皂苷 0.85 mg、DSPE- PEG2000 3.5 mg、DSPE-PEG2000-GGP-
        FV 2 mg。所制3批脂质体中,柔红霉素的包封率为(96.21±1.54)%,薯蓣皂苷的包封率为(95.39±2.48)%。体外细胞毒性试验
        显示,GGPFV 修饰的柔红霉素/薯蓣皂苷脂质体对 MDA-MB-435S 细胞的抑制作用显著强于柔红霉素/薯蓣皂苷脂质体(P<
        0.05),膜材无细胞毒性。结论:成功制得GGPFV修饰的柔红霉素/薯蓣皂苷脂质体,其对人乳腺癌MDA-MB-435S细胞的体外抑
        制作用明显增强。
        关键词 脂质体;GGPFV;柔红霉素;薯蓣皂苷;处方优化;Box-Behnken响应面法;细胞毒性


        Formulation Optimization and Cytotoxicity Study of GGPFV-modified Daunorubicin/dioscin Liposomes
        YAO Xuemin,JING Ming,CAI Fuyi,KONG Liang,LI Xuetao(School of Pharmacy,Liaoning University of
        TCM,Liaoning Dalian 116600,China)


        ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE:To prepare GGPFV-modified Daunorubicin/dioscin liposomes,and to optimize their formulation and
        to preliminarily evaluate their cytotoxicity to breast cancer cells in vitro. METHODS:Daunorubicin and diosgenin were wrapped by
        thin film dispersion method and ammonium sulfate hydration method;the surface was modified with DSPE-PEG2000-GGPFV to
        prepare GGPFV-modified Daunorubicin/dioscin liposomes. Taking encapsulation rate as index,Box-Behnken response surface
        methodology was used to optimize the film hydration volume,cholesterol amount and daunorubicin amount in the formulation. The
        entrapment efficiency of 3 batches of liposomes prepared according to the optimal formulation was determined. The effects of
        Daunorubicin/dioscin liposomes,GGPFV-modified Daunorubicin/dioscin liposomes and blank liposomes on the survival rate of
        human breast cancer MDA-MB-435S cells were compared. RESULTS:The optimal formulation was as film hydration volume of 5
        mL,cholesterol of 4 mg,yolk lecithin of 22 mg,daunorubicin of 0.55 mg,dioscin of 0.85 mg,DSPE-PEG2000 of 3.5 mg,
        DSPE-PEG2000-GGPFV of 2 mg. The encapsulation rate of daunorubicin was(96.21±1.54)% and that of dioscin was(95.39±
        2.48)% in the 3 batches of liposomes prepared. The in vitro cytotoxicity tests showed that the inhibition effect of GGPFV-modified
        Daunorubicin/dioscin liposome on MDA-MB-435S cells was significantly stronger than that of Daunorubicin/dioscin liposome(P<
        0.05). There was no cytotoxicity in the membrane. CONCLUSIONS: GGPFV-modified Daunorubicin/dioscin liposomes are
        successfully prepared,and its inhibitory effect on human breast cancer MDA-MB-435S cells in vitro was significantly enhanced.
        KEYWORDS     Liposome;GGPFV;Daunorubicin;Dioscin;Formulation optimization;Box-Behnken design response surface
        methodology;Cytotoxicity


            柔红霉素是一种蒽环类抗肿瘤抗生素,易溶于水且                         等 [1-2] 。柔红霉素的抗癌机制主要是其经肝脏代谢可生
        水溶液性质稳定,被广泛用于治疗急性白血病、慢性粒                           成柔红霉素醇,后者可通过嵌入癌细胞 DNA 碱基对来
        细胞性白血病、恶性淋巴瘤、非小细胞肺癌、乳腺癌                            改变DNA拓扑状态,并可通过抑制DNA聚合酶活性及

           Δ 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81874347)                损伤DNA来影响基因表达,从而达到杀伤肿瘤细胞、治
           *硕士研究生。研究方向:新型给药系统。电话:0411-85890145。            疗癌症的目的 。但是,柔红霉素在临床上表现出骨髓
                                                                        [3]
        E-mail:1106827103@qq.com
                                                           抑制、心肌损伤、胃肠道刺激、肝肾损伤及局部组织坏死
           # 通信作者:教授,博士生导师。研究方向:新型给药系统。电
        话:0411-85890145。E-mail:Lixuetao1979@163.com        等明显的毒副作用,故有研究者将其包裹在脂质体内核


        中国药房    2020年第31卷第21期                                             China Pharmacy 2020 Vol. 31 No. 21  ·2579 ·
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30