Page 99 - 《中国药房》2023年21期
P. 99

医院咳喘药学服务门诊药师培训质量评价标准指标体系构建
                                                                                                       Δ


                *
                                                       #
          葛艳慧 ,陈晓莉,赵晓玉,陈 哲,关克磊,杜书章(郑州大学第一附属医院药学部,郑州 450052)
          中图分类号  R952      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2023)21-2649-05
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.21.14

          摘  要  目的  构建医院咳喘药学服务门诊(CWPC)药师培训质量评价标准指标体系,为CWPC药师培训师资的选择以及培训方
          案的改善提供依据。方法  以柯氏模型为基础,采用德尔菲法对国内10个省份的13家三级甲等医院的15名专家进行函询,建立
          CWPC药师培训质量评价标准指标体系。采用层次分析法确定各级指标权重,并根据各级指标权重量化CWPC药师培训质量评
          价标准指标体系。结果  专家权威系数为 0.810,判断系数为 0.727,熟悉系数为 0.893。各级指标的肯德尔协调系数为 0.308~
          0.687,χ 检验P均小于0.05,说明专家函询结果的一致性高。经过2轮专家函询后,确定了以柯氏模型为基础的CWPC药师培训
               2
          质量评价标准指标体系,包括4个一级指标(学员反应层、学习收获层、行为改善层、培训成果层)、12个二级指标(培训需求、教学
          方法、理论知识、实践技能、岗位能力、患者受益等)和44个三级指标(培训目标明确、CWPC核心制度、特殊装置的操作和评价、咳
          喘患者治疗相关专业知识、推进CWPC的建设、患者依从性提高等)。结论  构建的医院CWPC药师培训质量评价标准指标体系
          具有一定权威性和科学性,为医院CWPC药师培训质量评价提供了科学的理论依据。
          关键词  咳喘药学服务门诊;药师;培训质量;评价标准;指标体系;柯氏模型

          Development  of  the  index  system  of  the  quality  evaluation  standard  for  pharmacist  training  in  cough  and
          wheeze pharmaceutical care outpatient department
          GE Yanhui,CHEN Xiaoli,ZHAO Xiaoyu,CHEN Zhe,GUAN Kelei,DU Shuzhang(Dept. of Pharmacy, the First

          Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China)

          ABSTRACT   OBJECTIVE  To  establish  the  index  system  of  quality  evaluation  standard  for  pharmacist  training  in  cough  and
          wheeze pharmaceutical care (CWPC) outpatient department, and to provide a basis for the selection of CWPC pharmacist training
          teachers  and  the  improvement  of  training  plans.  METHODS  Based  on  Kirkpatrick  model,  using  the  Delphi  method,  a  total  of  15
          experts  from  13  tertiary  hospitals  in  10  provinces  in  China  were  consulted  to  establish  the  standard  index  system  of  the  quality
          evaluation  for  CWPC  pharmacists  training.  Analytic  hierarchy  process (AHP)  was  adopted  to  determine  the  weights  of  each
          indicator  and  quantify  the  index  system  according  to  the  weights  of  indicators  at  all  levels.  RESULTS  The  coefficient  of  expert
          authority  was  0.810,  the  judgment  coefficient  was  0.727,  and  the  familiarity  coefficient  was  0.893.  The  Kendall  coordination
          coefficient  of  each  index  was  0.308-0.687.  The  P  values  of  χ   test  were  all  less  than  0.05,  which  indicated  that  the  degree  of
                                                          2
          coordination  of  the  experts  was  high.  After  two  rounds  of  correspondence,  Kirkpatrick  model-based  index  system  of  quality
          evaluation  standard  for  CWPC  pharmacist  training  was  determined.  The  index  system  included  4  first-level  indexes (participants’
          reaction layer, learning gain layer, behavior improvement layer, training outcome layer), 12 second-level indexes (such as training
          needs,  teaching  methods,  theoretical  knowledge,  practical  skills,  job  abilities,  patient  benefits,  etc.)  and  44  third-level  indexes
         (such  as  clear  training  objectives,  core  system  of  CWPC,  special  device  operation  and  evaluation,  professional  knowledge  related
          to  the  treatment  of  cough  and  wheeze  patients,  promoting  the  construction  of  CWPC,  improving  patient  compliance).
          CONCLUSIONS  The constructed index system of quality evaluation standard for CWPC pharmacist training has a certain level of
          authority and scientificity, and provides a scientific theoretical basis for quality evaluation of CWPC pharmacist training.
          KEYWORDS    cough  and  wheeze  pharmaceutical  care  outpatient  department;  pharmacist;  training  quality;  evaluation  standard;
          index system; Kirkpatrick model

             Δ 基金项目 河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建)项目(No.
          LHGJ20190271)                                          2020 年 1 月,中华医学会呼吸病学分会、中国医师
             *第一作者 主管药师,硕士。研究方向:药理学、药事管理。                    协会呼吸医师分会、中国药学会药学服务专业委员会启
          E-mail:yanhui651587@163.com
                                                             动了“呼吸与危重医学(PCCM)咳喘药学服务项目——
             # 通信作者 主任药师,博士。研究方向:药理学、药物经济学。
          E-mail:dushuzhang911@163.com                       咳喘药学服务门诊(cough and wheeze pharmaceutical


          中国药房  2023年第34卷第21期                                              China Pharmacy  2023 Vol. 34  No. 21    · 2649 ·
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104