Page 100 - 《中国药房》2021年07期
P. 100
tients with cancer:ASCO clinical practice guideline up- most,2012,108(2):303-310.
date[J]. J Clin Oncol,2020,38(5):496-520. [13] CHALAYER E,BOURMAUD A,TINQUAUT F,et al.
[ 2 ] 马军,秦叔逵,吴一龙,等.肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症预防 Cost-effectiveness analysis of low-molecular-weight hepa-
与治疗指南:2019 版[J].中国肿瘤临床,2019,46(13): rin versus aspirin thromboprophylaxis in patients newly
653-660. diagnosed with multiple myeloma[J]. Thromb Res,2016,
[ 3 ] STREIFF M,MILENTIJEVIC D,MCCRAE K R,et al. 145:119-125.
Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with [14] DRANITSARIS G,SHANE L,BURGERS L,et al. Eco-
venous thromboembolism in cancer patients treated with nomic analysis comparing dalteparin to vitamin K antago-
anticoagulants[J]. J Med Econ,2019,22(11):1134-1140. nists to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism in pa-
[ 4 ] NCCN. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: tients with cancer having renal impairment[J]. Clin Appl
cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease:2020. Thromb Hemost,2016,22(7):617-626.
V1[EB/OL]. [2020-04-16]. https://www.nccn.org/disclo- [15] CONNELL N T,ABEL G A,CONNORS J M. Low-mo-
sures/guidelinepanellisting.aspx. lecular weight heparin versus vitamin K antagonists for
[ 5 ] WANG T F,ZWICKER J I,AY C,et al. The use of direct the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis:a cost-
oral anticoagulants for primary thromboprophylaxis in am- effectiveness analysis[J]. Thromb Res,2017,150:53-58.
bulatory cancer patients:guidance from the SSC of the [16] DRANITSARIS G,SHANE L G,CROWTHER M,et al.
ISTH[J]. J Thromb Haemost,2019,17(10):1772-1778. Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the preven-
[ 6 ] 张嘉俊,杨琰茗,杨雅清,等. Ⅹa因子抑制剂预防和治疗 tion of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients
癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. with cancer and renal impairment:a Canadian pharmaco-
中国药房,2020,31(6):729-733. economic analysis[J]. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res,2017,
[ 7 ] HUSEREAU D,DRUMMOND M,PETROU S,et al. Con- 9:65-73.
solidated health economic evaluation reporting standards [17] DRANITSARIS G,SHANE L G,GALANAUD J P,et al.
(CHEERS):explanation and elaboration:a report of the Dalteparin or vitamin K antagonists to prevent recurrent
ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines venous thromboembolism in cancer patients:a patient-
good reporting practices task force[J]. Value Health,2013, level economic analysis for France and Austria[J]. Sup-
16(2):231-250. port Care Cancer,2017,25(7):2093-2102.
[ 8 ] RAJAN R,GAFNI A,LEVINE M,et al. Very low-dose [18] CONNELL N T,CONNORS J M. Cost-effectiveness of
warfarin prophylaxis to prevent thromboembolism in edoxaban versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-
women with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemothe- associated thrombosis[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis,2019,
rapy:an economic evaluation[J]. J Clin Oncol,1995,13 48(3):382-386.
(1):42-46. [19] LI A,MANOHAR P M,GARCIA D A,et al. Cost effec-
[ 9 ] AVRITSCHER E B,CANTOR S B,SHIH Y C,et al. Cost- tiveness analysis of direct oral anticoagulant(DOAC)ver-
minimization analysis of low-molecular-weight heparin sus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer associated
(dalteparin)compared to unfractionated heparin for inpa- thrombosis(CAT)in the United States[J]. Thromb Res,
tient treatment of cancer patients with deep venous throm- 2019,180:37-42.
bosis[J]. Support Care Cancer,2004,12(7):531-536. [20] DU J,WU B. New oral anticoagulants for thromboprophy-
[10] AUJESKY D,SMITH K J,CORNUZ J,et al. Cost-effec- laxis in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy:an
tiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin for secondary economic evaluation in a Chinese setting[J]. Clin Drug In-
prophylaxis of cancer-related venous thromboembo- vestig,2020,40(7):653-663.
lism[J]. Thromb Haemost,2005,93(3):592-599. [21] LI A,CARLSON J J,KUDERER N M,et al. Cost-effec-
[11] DRANITSARIS G,VINCENT M,CROWTHER M. Dal- tiveness analysis of low-dose direct oral anticoagulant
teparin versus warfarin for the prevention of recurrent ve- (DOAC)for the prevention of cancer-associated thrombo-
nous thromboembolic events in cancer patients:a pharma- sis in the United States[J]. Cancer,2020,126(8):1736-
coeconomic analysis[J]. Pharmacoeconomics,2006,24 1748.
(6):593-607. [22] LOPES D G,TAMAYO A,SCHIPP B,et al. Cost-effec-
[12] PISHKO A M,SMITH K J,RAGNI M V. Anticoagulation tiveness of edoxaban vs low-molecular-weight heparin
in ambulatory cancer patients with no indication for pro- and warfarin for cancer-associated thrombosis in Brazil
phylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation:a cost-effective- [J]. Thromb Res,2020,196:4-10.
ness analysis from a U.S. perspective[J]. Thromb Hae- [23] LEVINE M,HIRSH J,GENT M,et al. Double-blind ran-
·858 · China Pharmacy 2021 Vol. 32 No. 7 中国药房 2021年第32卷第7期