Page 100 - 《中国药房》2021年07期
P. 100

tients with cancer:ASCO clinical practice guideline up-  most,2012,108(2):303-310.
             date[J]. J Clin Oncol,2020,38(5):496-520.      [13]  CHALAYER E,BOURMAUD A,TINQUAUT F,et al.
        [ 2 ]  马军,秦叔逵,吴一龙,等.肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症预防                        Cost-effectiveness analysis of low-molecular-weight hepa-
             与治疗指南:2019 版[J].中国肿瘤临床,2019,46(13):                 rin versus aspirin thromboprophylaxis in patients newly
             653-660.                                            diagnosed with multiple myeloma[J]. Thromb Res,2016,
        [ 3 ]  STREIFF M,MILENTIJEVIC D,MCCRAE K R,et al.        145:119-125.
             Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with  [14]  DRANITSARIS G,SHANE L,BURGERS L,et al. Eco-
             venous thromboembolism in cancer patients treated with  nomic analysis comparing dalteparin to vitamin K antago-
             anticoagulants[J]. J Med Econ,2019,22(11):1134-1140.  nists to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism in pa-
        [ 4 ]  NCCN. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology:  tients with cancer having renal impairment[J]. Clin Appl
             cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease:2020.  Thromb Hemost,2016,22(7):617-626.
             V1[EB/OL]. [2020-04-16]. https://www.nccn.org/disclo-  [15]  CONNELL N T,ABEL G A,CONNORS J M. Low-mo-
             sures/guidelinepanellisting.aspx.                   lecular weight heparin versus vitamin K antagonists for
        [ 5 ]  WANG T F,ZWICKER J I,AY C,et al. The use of direct  the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis:a cost-
             oral anticoagulants for primary thromboprophylaxis in am-  effectiveness analysis[J]. Thromb Res,2017,150:53-58.
             bulatory cancer patients:guidance from the SSC of the  [16]  DRANITSARIS G,SHANE L G,CROWTHER M,et al.
             ISTH[J]. J Thromb Haemost,2019,17(10):1772-1778.    Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the preven-
        [ 6 ]  张嘉俊,杨琰茗,杨雅清,等. Ⅹa因子抑制剂预防和治疗                       tion of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients
             癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J].                        with cancer and renal impairment:a Canadian pharmaco-
             中国药房,2020,31(6):729-733.                            economic analysis[J]. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res,2017,
        [ 7 ]  HUSEREAU D,DRUMMOND M,PETROU S,et al. Con-        9:65-73.
             solidated health economic evaluation reporting standards  [17]  DRANITSARIS G,SHANE L G,GALANAUD J P,et al.
             (CHEERS):explanation and elaboration:a report of the  Dalteparin or vitamin K antagonists to prevent recurrent
             ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines  venous thromboembolism in cancer patients:a patient-
             good reporting practices task force[J]. Value Health,2013,  level economic analysis for France and Austria[J]. Sup-
             16(2):231-250.                                      port Care Cancer,2017,25(7):2093-2102.
        [ 8 ]  RAJAN R,GAFNI A,LEVINE M,et al. Very low-dose  [18]  CONNELL N T,CONNORS J M. Cost-effectiveness of
             warfarin prophylaxis to prevent thromboembolism in  edoxaban versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-
             women with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemothe-  associated thrombosis[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis,2019,
             rapy:an economic evaluation[J]. J Clin Oncol,1995,13  48(3):382-386.
             (1):42-46.                                     [19]  LI A,MANOHAR P M,GARCIA D A,et al. Cost effec-
        [ 9 ]  AVRITSCHER E B,CANTOR S B,SHIH Y C,et al. Cost-   tiveness analysis of direct oral anticoagulant(DOAC)ver-
             minimization analysis of low-molecular-weight heparin  sus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer associated
             (dalteparin)compared to unfractionated heparin for inpa-  thrombosis(CAT)in the United States[J]. Thromb Res,
             tient treatment of cancer patients with deep venous throm-  2019,180:37-42.
             bosis[J]. Support Care Cancer,2004,12(7):531-536.  [20]  DU J,WU B. New oral anticoagulants for thromboprophy-
        [10]  AUJESKY D,SMITH K J,CORNUZ J,et al. Cost-effec-    laxis in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy:an
             tiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin for secondary  economic evaluation in a Chinese setting[J]. Clin Drug In-
             prophylaxis of cancer-related venous thromboembo-   vestig,2020,40(7):653-663.
             lism[J]. Thromb Haemost,2005,93(3):592-599.    [21]  LI A,CARLSON J J,KUDERER N M,et al. Cost-effec-
        [11]  DRANITSARIS G,VINCENT M,CROWTHER M. Dal-           tiveness analysis of low-dose direct oral anticoagulant
             teparin versus warfarin for the prevention of recurrent ve-  (DOAC)for the prevention of cancer-associated thrombo-
             nous thromboembolic events in cancer patients:a pharma-  sis in the United States[J]. Cancer,2020,126(8):1736-
             coeconomic analysis[J]. Pharmacoeconomics,2006,24   1748.
             (6):593-607.                                   [22]  LOPES D G,TAMAYO A,SCHIPP B,et al. Cost-effec-
        [12]  PISHKO A M,SMITH K J,RAGNI M V. Anticoagulation    tiveness of edoxaban vs low-molecular-weight heparin
             in ambulatory cancer patients with no indication for pro-  and warfarin for cancer-associated thrombosis in Brazil
             phylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation:a cost-effective-  [J]. Thromb Res,2020,196:4-10.
             ness analysis from a U.S. perspective[J]. Thromb Hae-  [23]  LEVINE M,HIRSH J,GENT M,et al. Double-blind ran-


        ·858 ·  China Pharmacy 2021 Vol. 32 No. 7                                    中国药房    2021年第32卷第7期
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105