Page 139 - 《中国药房》2026年10期
P. 139

(9):919-926.                                        poietic stem cell transplant[J]. Transpl Infect Dis,2019,21
          [37]  LAZZARO  C.  Economic  evaluation  of  posaconazole  in   (5):e13148.
              prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in Italian neutro‐  [47]  STAM  W  B,O’SULLIVAN A  K,RIJNDERS  B,et  al.
              penic patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodys‐  Economic  evaluation  of  posaconazole  vs.  standard  azole
              plastic syndrome[J]. Infez Med,2010;18(2):91-103.   prophylaxis in high risk neutropenic patients in the Nether‐
          [38]  JUNJARUNEE  S,NUMUANG  K,LERDLITRUANGSIN          lands[J]. European J Haematology,2008,81(6):467-474.
              S,et al. Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus flucona-  [48]  DRANITSARIS G,KHOURY H. Posaconazole versus flu‐
              zole or itraconazole in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal   conazole or itraconazole for prevention of invasive fungal
              infections  among  neutropenic  patients  in  Thailand[J].   infections  in  patients  undergoing  intensive  cytotoxic
              Value Health,2014,17(7):A806.                       therapy for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasia:a
          [39]  LUNDBERG J,HÖGLUND M,BJÖRKHOLM M,et al.           cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. Support Care Cancer,2011,
              Economic  evaluation  of  posaconazole  versus  fluconazole   19(11):1807-1813.
              or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infec‐  [49]  HENG  S  C,SLAVIN  M  A,AL-BADRIYEH  D,et  al.
              tion  in  high-risk  neutropenic  patients  in  Sweden[J].  Clin   Pharmacoeconomic  evaluation  of  fluconazole,posacona-
              Drug Investig,2014,34(7):483-489.                   zole  and  voriconazole  for  antifungal  prophylaxis  in  pa‐
          [40]  O’SULLIVAN A K,PANDYA A,PAPADOPOULOS G,           tients with acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing first con‐
              et  al.  Cost-effectiveness  of  posaconazole  versus  flucona-  solidation  chemotherapy[J].  J  Antimicrob  Chemother,
              zole  or  itraconazole  in  the  prevention  of  invasive  fungal   2013,68(7):1669-1678.
              infections among neutropenic patients in the United States  [50]  MICHALLET M,GANGNEUX J P,LAFUMA A,et al.
              [J]. Value Health,2009,12(5):666-673.               Cost  effectiveness  of  posaconazole  in  the  prophylaxis  of
          [41]  O’SULLIVAN A K,WEINSTEIN M C,PANDYA A,et          invasive fungal infections in acute leukaemia patients for
              al. Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole   the  French  healthcare  system[J].  J  Med  Econ,2011,14
              for  prevention  of  invasive  fungal  infections  in  U. S.  pa‐  (1):28-35.
              tients with graft-versus-host disease[J]. Am J Health Syst   [51]  ATHANASAKIS  K,PETRAKIS  I,KYRIOPOULOS  J.
              Pharm,2012,69(2):149-156.                           Posaconazole  vs  fluconazole/itraconazole  in  the  prophy‐
          [42]  TAHAMI  MONFARED  A  A,O’SULLIVAN  A  K,          laxis  of  invasive  fungal  infections  in  immunocompro‐
              ROTSTEIN  C,et  al.  Economic  evaluation  of  posacona-  mised patients:a cost-effectiveness analysis in Greece[J].
              zole versus standard azole therapy as prophylaxis against   J Med Econ,2013,16(5):678-684.
              invasive fungal infections in patients with prolonged neu‐  [52]  SÁNCHEZ-ORTEGA  I,PATIÑO  B,MUÑOZ  C,et  al.
              tropenia  in  Canada[J].  Can  J  Infect  Dis  Med  Microbiol,  Cost-effectiveness of primary antifungal prophylaxis with
              2012,23(2):59-64.                                   posaconazole  versus  itraconazole  in  allogeneic  hemato-
          [43]  TUON F F B,LINO FLORENCIO K,DA CUNHA C A,         poietic stem cell transplantation[J]. J Med Econ,2013,16
              et  al.  Cost-effectiveness  of  posaconazole  in  private  and   (6):736-743.
              public Brazilian hospitals[J]. Rev Iberoam De Micología,  [53]  CHAN T S Y,MARCELLA S W,GILL H,et al. Posacona-
              2018,35(2):63-67.                                   zole  vs  fluconazole  or  itraconazole  for  prevention  of  in-
          [44]  UMIT E. Economic analysis of oral posaconazole prophy‐  vasive fungal diseases in patients with acute myeloid leu‐
              laxis  in  acute  myeloid  leukemia  during  remission  induc‐  kemia  or  myelodysplastic  syndrome:a  cost-effectiveness
              tion  in  Turkey[J].  North  Clin  Istanbul,2019,7(3):  analysis  in  an  Asian  teaching  hospital[J].  J  Med  Econ,
              222-225.                                            2016,19(1):77-83.
          [45]  PUNGPRASERT  T, DHIRACHAIKULPANICH  D,       [54]  王彪,房文通,傅源源. 泊沙康唑预防血液恶性肿瘤患者
              PHUTTHASAKDA W,et  al. The  cost-utility  analysis  of   侵袭性真菌感染的快速卫生技术评估[J]. 药物流行病学
              antifungal  prophylaxis  for  invasive  fungal  infections  in   杂志,2021,30(10):661-669.
              acute  myeloid  leukaemia  patients  receiving  chemo‐  [55]  柴双,展敬伦,肇丽梅,等 . 5 种三唑类抗真菌药物的药
              therapy:a study from a middle-income country[J]. J Hosp   物不良反应分析[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志,2022,38
              Infect,2024,145:118-128.                           (17):2079-2083.
          [46]  WALKER B S,SCHMIDT R L,TANTRAVAHI S,et al.                  (收稿日期:2025-12-25  修回日期:2026-05-07)
              Cost-effectiveness  of  antifungal  prophylaxis,preemptive                          (编辑:陈 宏)
              therapy,or empiric treatment following allogeneic hemato‐







          中国药房  2026年第37卷第10期                                              China Pharmacy  2026 Vol. 37  No. 10    · 1369 ·
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144