Page 112 - 《中国药房》2025年18期
P. 112

·循证药学·


          ICIs联合新辅助及辅助化疗用于早期三阴性乳腺癌的Meta分析
                                                                                                            Δ

                                   3
                           2
                                                   1
                                           2
                 1*
                                                            1 #
          杨春艳 ,张少华 ,李容康 ,彭 磊 ,赵 丽 ,别 俊 [1.首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院南充医院(南充市
          中心医院)肿瘤科,四川 南充 637000;2.深圳大学附属华南医院泌尿外科,广东 深圳 518000;3.兰州大学第
          二医院泌尿外科,兰州 730030]
          中图分类号  R979.1      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2025)18-2322-06
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.18.19


          摘   要  目的  评价免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合新辅助及辅助化疗用于早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的有效性和安全性。方法
          检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方数据,收集ICIs联合新辅助及辅助化疗(试验组)对比新辅助化疗及辅助
          化疗(对照组)用于早期 TNBC 的随机对照试验(RCT)。筛选文献、提取资料,评价文献质量后,采用 Stata 17.0 软件进行 Meta分
          析。结果  共纳入 5 项 RCT,共计 1 498 例患者。Meta 分析结果显示,试验组患者的病理完全缓解率(pCR)[RR=1.34,95%CI
         (1.09,1.63),P=0.03]、程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)及其配体(PD-L1)阳性患者的pCR[RR=1.33,95%CI(1.16,1.51),P=0.01]、淋巴
          结阳性患者的 pCR[RR=1.56,95%CI(1.27,1.93),P=0.01]、3~4 级不良事件(AE)发生率[RR=1.07,95%CI(1.01,1.14),P=
          0.04]、严重 AE 发生率[RR=1.57,95%CI(1.31,1.87),P=0.03]、因 AE 停药发生率[RR=1.45,95%CI(1.19,1.76),P=0.01]均显著
          高于对照组;两组 PD-1/PD-L1 阴性患者的 pCR[RR=1.26,95%CI(0.98,1.62),P=0.08]和淋巴结阴性患者的 pCR[RR=1.14,
          95%CI(0.97,1.33),P=0.17]比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论  ICIs联合新辅助及辅助化疗用于早期TNBC患者的疗效显著,且
          PD-1/PD-L1阳性和淋巴结阳性的患者获益更显著,但AE发生率较高。
          关键词  三阴性乳腺癌;免疫检查点抑制剂;新辅助化疗;辅助化疗;有效性;安全性;Meta分析

          Immune  checkpoint  inhibitors  combined  with  neoadjuvant  chemotherapy  and  adjuvant  chemotherapy  in
          the treatment of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis
                                          2
                                                        3
          YANG Chunyan ,ZHANG Shaohua ,LI Rongkang ,PENG Lei ,ZHAO Li ,BIE Jun [1.  Dept.  of  Oncology,
                                                                   2
                         1
                                                                                       1
                                                                              1
          Nanchong  Hospital  Affiliated  to  Beijing  Anzhen  Hospital,  Capital  Medical  University (Nanchong  Central
          Hospital), Sichuan Nanchong 637000, China;2. Dept. of Urology, South China Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen
          University,  Guangdong  Shenzhen  518000,  China;3.  Dept.  of  Urology,  the  Second  Hospital  of  Lanzhou
          University, Lanzhou 730030, China]
          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE  To  evaluate  the  efficacy  and  safety  of  immune  checkpoint  inhibitors  combined  with  neoadjuvant
          chemotherapy  and  adjuvant  chemotherapy  in  the  treatment  of  early-stage  triple-negative  breast  cancer (TNBC).  METHODS  A
          systematic  search  was  conducted  in  PubMed,  Embase,  Cochrane  Library,  CNKI,  and  Wanfang  Data  to  collect  randomized
          controlled  trials (RCT)  on  the  use  of  immune  checkpoint  inhibitors  combined  with  neoadjuvant  chemotherapy  and  adjuvant
          chemotherapy (experimental  group)  versus  neoadjuvant  chemotherapy  and  adjuvant  chemotherapy (control  group)  in  the  treatment
          of TNBC. After literature screening, data extraction and literature quality evaluation, meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0.
          RESULTS  A  total  of  5  RCT  involving  1  498  patients  were  included.  The  meta-analysis  results  showed  that  the  pathological
          complete  response  rate (pCR)  [RR=1.34,  95%CI (1.09,  1.63),  P=0.03],  pCR  in  patients  with  positive  programmed  death-1
         (PD-1)  and  its  ligand (PD-L1)  [RR=1.33,  95%CI (1.16,  1.51),  P=0.01],  pCR  in  patients  with  positive  lymph  nodes  [RR=
          1.56,  95%CI (1.27,  1.93),  P=0.01],  the  incidence  of  grade  3-4  adverse  events (AEs)  [RR=1.07,  95%CI (1.01,  1.14),  P=
                                                              0.04], the incidence of serious AEs [RR=1.57, 95%CI (1.31,
              Δ 基金项目 国家自然科学基金项目(No.82102171);四川省省级
                                                              1.87) ,  P=0.03],  and  the  incidence  of  treatment
          科 技 计 划 项 目(No. 2023YFS0473);南 充 市 科 技 计 划 项 目(No.
          21YFZJ0082);深圳市医学研究专项资金(No.A2302048);四川省护理          discontinuation  due  to AEs  [RR=1.45,  95%CI (1.19,  1.76),
          科研课题立项项目(No.H22051)                                 P=0.01]  were  significantly  higher  in  the  experimental  group
             *第一作者 主管护师。研究方向:肿瘤疾病基础与临床。
                                                              than  control  group.  There  were  no  statistically  significant
          E-mail:ycy330507@126.com
              # 通信作者 主任医师,博士。研究方向:肿瘤疾病基础与临床。                  difference  in  pCR  in  patients  with  negative  PD-1/PD-L1[RR=
          E-mail:biejun23@126.com                             1.26,  95%CI (0.98,  1.62),  P=0.08]  and  pCR  in  patients


          · 2322 ·    China Pharmacy  2025 Vol. 36  No. 18                            中国药房  2025年第36卷第18期
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117