Page 12 - 《中国药房》2025年8期

[14] MOBINIZADEH M，RAEISSI P，NASIRIPOUR A A，et 08]. https：//effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/about/epc/nomi‐
al. A model for priority setting of health technology assess‐ nation.
ment：the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination ap‐ [27] The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in
proach[J]. Daru，2016，24：10. Health. Topic identification and prioritization process[EB/
[15] JANKAUSKIENE D，PETRONYTE G. A model for HTA OL]. [2023-07-13]. https：//www.cadth.ca/sites/default/
priority setting：experience in Lithuania[J]. Int J Technol files/pdf/HTA_OU_Topic_ID_and_Prioritization_Process.
Assess Health Care，2013，29（4）：450-455. pdf.
[16] YOUNGKONG S，BALTUSSEN R，TANTIVESS S，et [28] European Network for Health Technology Assessment.
al. Multicriteria decision analysis for including health in‐ Topic identification，selection and prioritisation[EB/OL].
terventions in the universal health coverage benefit pac- [2023-07-07]. https：//www. eunethta. eu/ja3services/horizon-
kage in Thailand[J]. Value Health，2012，15（6）：961-970. scanning/.
[17] BASTIAN H，SCHEIBLER F，KNELANGEN M，et al. [29] Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program.
Choosing health technology assessment and systematic re‐ Health technology assessment process guidelines[EB/OL].
view topics：the development of priority-setting criteria [2023-07-13]. https：//www.hitap.net/en/documents/21282.
for patients’ and consumers’ interests[J]. Int J Technol [30] Health Technology Wales. Our appraisal process[EB/OL].
Assess Health Care，2011，27（4）：348-356. [2023-07-10]. https：//healthtechnology.wales/about/our-
[18] HUSEREAU D，BOUCHER M，NOORANI H. Priority appraisal-process/.
setting for health technology assessment at CADTH[J]. Int [31] Institute for Clinical & Economic Review. A guide to
J Technol Assess Health Care，2010，26（3）：341-347. ICER’s methods for health technology assessment[EB/
[19] WHITLOCK E P，LOPEZ S A，CHANG S，et al. AHRQ OL]. [2023-07-10]. https：//icer. org/wp-content/uploads/
series paper 3：identifying，selecting，and refining topics 2021/01/ICER_HTA_Guide_102720.pdf.
for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews：AHRQ [32] German Drug Evaluation Agency. Themencheck medizin：
and the effective healthcare program[J]. J Clin Epidemiol， thema vorschlagen[EB/OL]. [2023-07-10]. https：//www.
2010，63（5）：491-501. iqwig.de/sich-einbringen/themencheck-medizin/formular-
[20] MENON D，STAFINSKI T. Engaging the public in themenvorschlag/.
priority-setting for health technology assessment：findings [33] Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre. Topic selection
from a citizens’ jury[J]. Health Expect，2008，11（3）： for the annual programme KCE[EB/OL]. [2023-07-14].
282-293. https：//kce.fgov.be/en/submit-a-topic/topic-selection-for-
[21] CARLSSON P. Health technology assessment and priority the-annual-programme.
setting for health policy in Sweden[J]. Int J Technol As‐ [34] Health Technology Assessment Section. Health techno-
sess Health Care，2004，20（1）：44-54. logy assessment[EB/OL]. [2023-07-14]. https：//www.moh.
[22] OORTWIJN W J，VONDELING H，VAN BARNEVELD gov.my/moh/resources/HTA_MANUAL_MAHTAS.pdf.
T，et al. Priority setting for health technology assessment [35] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE
in the Netherlands：principles and practice[J]. Health health technology evaluation topic selection：the manual
Policy，2002，62（3）：227-242. [EB/OL]. [2023-07-10]. https：//www.nice.org.uk/process/
[23] SHANI S，SIEBZEHNER M I，LUXENBURG O，et al. pmg37/chapter/about-this-guide.
Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies [36] Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and
on a national level：the Israeli experience[J]. Health Assessment of Social Services. Selection of topics[EB/
Policy，2000，54（3）：169-185. OL]. [2023-07-10]. https：//www.sbu.se/en/about-sbu/
[24] DONALDSON M S，SOX H C. Setting priorities for selection-of-topics/.
health technology assessment：a model process[M]. [37] Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. HTA programme
Washington，D.C.：National Academy Press，1992：84-87. [EB/OL]. [2023-07-10]. https：//www. bag. admin. ch/bag/
[25] Agency for Care Effectiveness. Process & methods[EB/ en/home/versicherungen/krankenversicherung/krankenversi-
OL].[2023-07-08]. https：//www.ace-hta.gov.sg/resources/ cherung-leistungen-tarife/hta/hta-programm.html.
process-methods. （收稿日期：2025-01-07 修回日期：2025-03-19）
[26] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. EHC pro‐ （编辑：孙 冰）
gram topic nomination and selection[EB/OL]. [2023-07-

· 902 · China Pharmacy 2025 Vol. 36 No. 8 中国药房 2025年第36卷第8期