Page 80 - 《中国药房》2023年20期
P. 80

不同厂家八宝惊风散中人工牛黄胆汁酸类活性成分的含量测定

          及差异分析
                            Δ


                                           2
                           2
                                   2
                                                   2 #
                                                            3
                 1*
          钟 琪 ,陈伟康 ,周国平 ,刘艳梅 ,刘德鸿 ,李 晶(1.赣州市人民医院药剂科,江西 赣州 341000;2.江西
          省药品检验检测研究院/国家药品监督管理局中成药质量评价重点实验室/江西省药品与医疗器械质量工程技
          术研究中心,南昌 330029;3.江西省中医药研究院,南昌 330029)
          中图分类号  R927.2      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2023)20-2502-05
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.20.10

          摘   要  目的  建立同时测定八宝惊风散中人工牛黄有效成分(胆酸、猪去氧胆酸和牛磺胆酸钠)含量的方法,比较不同厂家样品
          中3个成分的含量差异。方法  采用超高效液相串联质谱法测定3个厂家9批八宝惊风散中胆酸、猪去氧胆酸和牛磺胆酸钠的含
          量,色谱柱为Phenomenex Luna  C18,流动相为乙腈-水(梯度洗脱),流速为0.5 mL/min,柱温为40 ℃,进样量为2 μL。质谱采用负
                                  ®
          离子单四极杆模式,胆酸、猪去氧胆酸和牛磺胆酸钠的m/z分别为407.2、392.2、514.2。以3个成分的含量为指标,对9批样品进行
          聚类分析和主成分分析。结果  胆酸、猪去氧胆酸和牛磺胆酸钠的线性范围分别为5.48~548.40、5.38~538.40、4.74~474.05 ng/mL
         (r≥0.999 3);精密度、重复性、稳定性(24 h)的RSD均不高于3.7%(n=6),平均回收率分别为103.3%、103.3%、101.6%,RSD分别
          为 3.3%、3.4%、4.2%(n=6)。9 批样品中胆酸、猪去氧胆酸、牛磺胆酸钠的含量分别为 0.702~1.711、0.599~2.049、0.664~1.752
          mg/g。A厂家样品中3个成分的平均含量较高,批间差异最小;C厂家样品中3个成分的平均含量最低,批间差异较大。聚类分析
          基本可以区分不同厂家的样品;以主成分综合得分为指标进行聚类分析,结果与含量聚类分析结果基本一致。结论  成功建立了
          同时测定八宝惊风散中人工牛黄3个胆汁酸类有效成分含量的方法。各厂家样品中3个成分的含量存在较大差异。
          关键词  八宝惊风散;胆酸;猪去氧胆酸;牛磺胆酸钠;人工牛黄;含量测定


          Determination and difference analysis of bile acid active constituents of artificial bezoar in Babao jingfeng
          powder from different manufacturers
          ZHONG Qi ,CHEN Weikang ,ZHOU Guoping ,LIU Yanmei ,LIU Dehong ,LI Jing(1. Dept. of Pharmacy, The
                                                   2
                                    2
                                                                                    3
                    1
                                                                            2
                                                                2
          People’s  Hospital  of  Ganzhou,  Jiangxi  Ganzhou  341000,  China;2.  Jiangxi  Institute  for  Drug  Control/NMPA
          Key  Laboratory  of  Quality  Evaluation  of  Traditional  Chinese  Patent  Medicine/Jiangxi  Provincial  Engineering
          Research  Center  of  Drug  and  Medical  Device  Quality,  Nanchang  330029,  China;3.  Jiangxi  Provincial  Institute
          of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330029, China)
          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE  To  establish  the  method  for  determination  of  bile  acid  active  constituents  (cholic  acid,
          hyodeoxycholic acid and sodium taurocholate) in Babao jingfeng powder, and to compare the differences of 3 constituents in Babao
          jingfeng  powder  from  different  manufacturers.  METHODS  UPLC-MS  method  was  adopted  to  determine  the  contents  of  cholic
          acid,  hyodeoxycholic  acid  and  sodium  taurocholate  in  9  batches  of  Babao  jingfeng  powder  from  3  manufacturers.  The  separation
          was  performed  on  a  Phenomenex  Luna   C18 column  with  mobile  phase  consisted  of  acetonitrile-water (gradient  elution)  at  a  flow
                                        ®
          rate  of  0.5  mL/min.  The  column  temperature  was  40  ℃  and  the  sample  size  was  2  μL.  MS  system  was  operated  in  a  negative  ion
          single  quadrupole  mode,  and  the  m/z  of  cholic  acid,  hyodeoxycholic  acid  and  sodium  taurocholate  were  407.2,  392.2  and  514.2,
          respectively. With the contents of three components as the index, cluster analysis and principle component analysis were performed
          on  9  batches  of  samples.  RESULTS  The  linear  ranges  of  cholic  acid,  hyodeoxycholic  acid  and  sodium  taurocholate  were  5.48-
                                                              548.40,  5.38-538.40,  4.74-474.05  ng/mL,  respectively  (r≥
              Δ 基金项目 江西省中医药中青年骨干人才(第一批)培养计划项
                                                              0.999  3).  RSDs  of  precision,  repeatability  and  stability  tests
          目(No.赣中医药科教字〔2020〕2号)                              (24  h)  were  all  lower  than  or  equal  to  3.7% (n=6),  and  the
              *第一作者 主管药师,硕士。研究方向:药物分析。E-mail:
                                                              average  recoveries  were  103.3%,  103.3%  and  101.6%  with
          570661008@qq.com
              # 通信作者 主管中药师,硕士。研究方向:中成药质量控制与评                  RSDs of 3.3%, 3.4%, 4.2% (n=6), respectively. The contents
          价。E-mail:479193106@qq.com                           of  cholic  acid  ranged  0.702-1.711  mg/g,  those  of  deoxycholic


          · 2502 ·    China Pharmacy  2023 Vol. 34  No. 20                            中国药房  2023年第34卷第20期
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85