Page 28 - 《中国药房》2023年11期
P. 28

英国NICE卫生技术评估公众参与机制及启示                                                  Δ



          金秋晨 ,李梦颖,陈永法(中国药科大学国际医药商学院,南京 211198)
                                 #
                *
          中图分类号  R95      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2023)11-1302-05
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.11.04


          摘   要  目的  深入剖析英国国家卫生与服务优化研究院(NICE)卫生技术评估公众参与机制,以期为我国医保目录动态调整工
          作提供经验借鉴。方法  检索相关文献及官方网站,对英国NICE卫生技术评估公众参与类型、参与机制(管理机构、遴选方式、参
          与模式、评估反馈)进行分析,并据此提出对我国医保目录调整公众参与的建议。结果与结论  当前NICE卫生技术评估公众参与
          类型主要涉及患者及照护者组织、评估委员会非专业成员、患者专家、公众观察员4类。在管理层面,NICE设立了公众参与团队
          并制定了有关公众参与事项的指南;针对不同类型公众,NICE确定了兴趣表达、NICE邀请、公开招聘、提名、NICE决定等不同的
          遴选程序;公众参与的类型多样,且从卫生技术评估最初的主题范围确定到最终的上诉,全程均有公众的参与;建立了灵活动态的
          评估反馈体系以优化公众参与的方式和卫生技术评估流程;开展了广泛的国际合作与交流以促进国家和国际层面的公众参与。
          建议我国结合国情,明确公众参与卫生技术评估的渠道,成立公众参与事务工作小组,加强患者参与评估与反馈,提高决策透明
          度,从渠道开设、管理机制、评估反馈、信息公开等方面不断完善我国卫生技术评估公众参与机制。
          关键词  卫生技术评估;公众参与;英国国家卫生与服务优化研究院;启示

          Mechanism and enlightenment of public participation in the NICE health technology assessment in England
          JIN Qiuchen,LI Mengying,CHEN Yongfa(School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical
          University, Nanjing 211198, China)


          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE  To  analyze  the  public  participation  mechanism  of  National  Institute  for  Health  and  Care  Excellence
         (NICE)  health  technology  assessment  in  England  and  to  provide  experience  for  the  dynamic  adjustment  of  Chinese  medical
          insurance  catalog.  METHODS  By  retrieving  related  literature  and  official  websites,  types  and  mechanisms  of  public  participation
         (management  organization,  selection  method,  participation  mode,  evaluation  feedback)  in  NICE  health  technology  assessment
          were  analyzed  comprehensively;  and  based  on  this,  suggestions  were  put  forward  to  adjust  the  public  participation  in  Chinese
          medical  insurance  catalog.  RESULTS  &  CONCLUSIONS  The  current  public  participation  types  of  NICE  health  technology
          assessment  were  patient  and  carer  organizations,  HTA  committee  lay  members,  patient  expert  and  public  observers.  At  the
          management  level,  NICE  has  set  up  a  public  participation  team  and  made  guidelines  on  public  participation  matters.  For  different
          public  participation  types,  NICE  has  established  different  selection  procedures,  such  as  expression  of  interest,  NICE  invitation,
          open  recruitment,  nomination,  NICE  decision,  etc.  The  public  participation  types  are  various  and  in  the  whole  assessing  process
          from  the  initial  determination  of  the  scope  of  the  health  technology  assessment  to  the  final  appeal. Also,  NICE  has  established  a
          flexible  and  dynamic  evaluation  feedback  system  to  optimize  the  way  of  public  participation  and  the  health  technology  assessment
          process; NICE has undertaken extensive international cooperation and exchanges to promote public participation at the national and
          international  levels.  It  is  suggested  that  our  country  should  combine  the  national  conditions,  clarify  the  channel  of  public
          participation  in  health  technology  evaluation,  set  up  a  working  group  of  public  participation  affairs,  strengthen  patients’
          participation in evaluation and feedback, improve decision-making transparency, and improve the public participation mechanism of
          health  technology  evaluation  from  the  aspects  of  channel  opening,  management  mechanism,  evaluation  feedback,  information
          disclosure and so on.
          KEYWORDS     health  technology  assessment;  public  participation;  National  Institute  for  Health  and  Care  Excellence  in  England;
          enlightenment


                                                                  卫生技术评估(health technology assessment,HTA)
              Δ 基金项目 2020 年 江 苏 省 研 究 生 科 研 创 新 计 划 项 目(No.   是一种对卫生技术的性质、效用和结果进行系统性评估
          KYCX20_0697)                                        的综合评价研究方法 ,广泛应用于支持临床和卫生管
                                                                                [1]
             *第一作者 硕士研究生。研究方向:医药政策与药物经济学评                     理决策。近年来,HTA在我国正经历由科学研究向政策
          价。E-mail:cathieee@outlook.com
                                                              应用转化的快速发展阶段 。自 2017 年我国将 HTA 引
                                                                                     [2]
              # 通信作者 教授,博士生导师,博士。研究方向:国内外药事法规
          与药品评价。E-mail:cyf990@163.com                         入国家医保药品准入谈判工作至今,其大幅度提升了谈

          · 1302 ·    China Pharmacy  2023 Vol. 34  No. 11                            中国药房  2023年第34卷第11期
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33