Page 108 - 《中国药房》2022年22期
P. 108

牛/猪肺表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的快速卫生技

          术评估
                     Δ


                 1*
                                                                            2
                                                                    1
                           1
                                                            1
                                                                                    1 #
                                                   1
          郭 华 ,邵 云 ,刘兰兰 ,任鹏飞 ,付 强 ,孙 楠 ,周建超 ,康 建 ,任艳丽 (1.郑州大学第三附属医院
                                   1
                                           1
          药学部,郑州 450052;2.郑州大学第一附属医院药学部,郑州 450052)
          中图分类号  R722.1;R969.3      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2022)22-2786-05
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.22.20
          摘   要  目的  比较牛肺表面活性物质(PS)和猪PS治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的有效性、安全性和经济性。方法  计算机
          检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、SinoMed、万方数据、国内外卫生技术评估(HTA)机构官方网站及相关数据库,
          收集牛PS与猪PS对比治疗早产儿RDS的HTA报告、系统评价/Meta分析和药物经济学研究,检索时限均为建库起至2022年2月。
          资料提取和质量评价后,对纳入研究的结果进行描述性分析。结果  共纳入1篇HTA报告、6篇系统评价/Meta分析、6篇药物经济
          学研究。牛PS在新生儿重症监护病房住院时间和肺外指标发生率方面与猪PS相当;PS再治疗率、血气指标、总有效率、动脉导管
          未闭发生率方面,猪PS较牛PS更有优势;两者在死亡率和支气管肺发育不良、漏气综合征、肺出血发生率方面的结果存在争议。
          经济性方面,两组患儿的平均住院费用、每剂给药成本的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);与猪PS比较,牛PS的平均每剂浪费成本
          更高(P<0.001),治疗24 h平均费用更低(P<0.05);平均药品费用的结果存在争议。结论  牛PS治疗早产儿RDS的有效性、安全
          性和经济性与猪PS相当或劣于猪PS,但其劣势尚不确定是否具有显著的临床意义。
          关键词  肺表面活性物质;早产儿;呼吸窘迫综合征;有效性;安全性;经济性;快速卫生技术评估


          Rapid  health  technology  assessment  of  bovine  pulmonary  surfactant  versus  porcine  ones  in  the  treatment
          of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome
                                                                  1
                                          1
                                                                            1
                                                       1
                                                                                                       2
                                                                                           1
          GUO Hua ,SHAO Yun ,LIU Lanlan ,REN Pengfei ,FU Qiang ,SUN Nan ,ZHOU Jianchao ,KANG Jian ,REN
                              1
                   1
          Yanli(1. Dept. of Pharmacy,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China;2.
               1
          Dept. of Pharmacy,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China)
          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE  To  compare  the  effectiveness,safety  and  economy  of  bovine  pulmonary  surfactant (PS)  and  porcine
          PS in the treatment of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). METHODS  Retrieved from PubMed,Embase,
          Cochrane Library,CNKI,SinoMed,Wanfang and health technology assessment (HTA) organization websites and relevant database,
          HTA  report,systematic  review/meta-analysis  and  pharmacoeconomic  study  about  bovine  PS  versus  porcine  PS  in  the  treatment  of
          preterm  neonates  with  RDS  were  included  from  the  inception  to  Feb  2022.  Data  extraction  and  quality  evaluation  were  carried  out
          for  the  included  literature,and  then  research  results  were  summarized  and  analyzed  descriptively.  RESULTS  A  total  of  1  HTA
          report,6  systematic  reviews/meta-analyses,and  6  pharmacoeconomic  studies  were  included.  There  appeared  to  be  no  significant
          differences  between  bovine  PS  and  porcine  PS  in  terms  of  time  staying  in  neonatal  intensive  care  unit  and  extra-pulmonary
          outcomes. In terms of PS re-treatment,blood gas index,total effective rate and the incidence of patent ductus arteriosus,porcine PS
          was  superior  to  bovine  PS.  Results  from  other  indicators,such  as  mortality,  the  incidence  of  bronchopulmonary  dysplasia,air
          leakage  syndrome,pulmonary  hemorrhage,were  still  controversial.  In  terms  of  economy,there  was  no  statistical  difference  in
          average hospital charges and administration cost per dose between two groups (P>0.05); compared with porcine PS,mean wastage
          cost  per  dose  of  bovine  PS  was  higher (P<0.001),and  24  h  treatment  cost  of  bovine  PS  was  lower (P<0.05);  the  results  of
          average medication cost were controversial. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness, safety and economy of bovine PS are found to be
          similar or inferior to porcine PS. It is not certain whether the inferiority has clinical significance.
                                                              KEYWORDS    pulmonary   surfactant;   preterm   neonate;
                                                              respiratory   distress   syndrome;   effectiveness;   safety;
              Δ 基金项目 河南省卫生健康委员会委托项目(No. 豫卫药政函
          〔2021〕6 号 );河 南 省 医 学 科 技 攻 关 计 划 联 合 共 建 项 目(No.   economy; rapid health technology assessment
          LHGJ20200463)
             *第一作者 副主任药师,硕士。研究方向:临床药学、循证药学。                       呼 吸 窘 迫 综 合 征(respiratory  distress  syndrome,
          电话:0371-66903015。E-mail:guohuahua0421@163.com
              # 通信作者 主任药师,硕士。研究方向:药事管理。电话:0371-               RDS)是由肺表面活性物质(pulmonary surfactant,PS)缺
          66903150。E-mail:yanli535@163.com                    乏所致,以胎儿出生后不久出现呼吸窘迫并进行性加重


          · 2786 ·    China Pharmacy  2022 Vol. 33  No. 22                            中国药房  2022年第33卷第22期
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113