Page 12 - 202006

贵州省中药民族药企业可持续发展能力评价指标体系研究 Δ

＊
#
王灵芝 ，周戈耀 ，雷 雪，田海玉，孟小夏，何 迅（贵州医科大学医药卫生管理学院，贵阳 550025）
中图分类号 F272；R194；R95 文献标志码 A 文章编号 1001-0408（2020）06-0646-05
DOI 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2020.06.02

摘 要 目的：构建贵州省中药民族药企业可持续发展能力评价指标体系，促进中药民族药产业可持续发展。方法：通过文献收
集和专题小组讨论拟定评价指标体系草案，采用德尔菲法进行两轮专家问卷调查并确定最终纳入的指标及权重；运用所建指标体
系进行实测，将其结果与药监部门及行业权威人士的评价结果进行比对。结果：初拟的评价指标体系草案包括6个一级指标，49
个二级指标。两轮专家咨询的积极系数均为100％，专家对各级指标意见的权威系数为0.86；第1轮专家的协调系数为0.22，第2
轮专家的协调系数为0.48。经过两轮专家咨询，最终确定的指标体系包括6个一级指标，33个二级指标。选取贵州省15家中药民
族药企业进行现场实测，其评价结果与药监部门及行业权威人士的评判结果相差不大。结论：构建的中药民族药企业可持续发展
能力评价指标体系具有较好的科学性、客观性和可行性，可为相关部门对中药民族药企业进行监督评估提供标准化依据。
关键词 中药民族药企业；可持续发展能力；德尔菲法；专家咨询；指标体系
Study on Sustainable Development Ability Evaluation Index System for Ethnomedicine Enterprises in
Guizhou Province
WANG Lingzhi，ZHOU Geyao，LEI Xue，TIAN Haiyu，MENG Xiaoxia，HE Xun（School of Medicine and Health
Management，Guizhou Medical University，Guiyang 550025，China）

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE：To establish sustainable development ability evaluation index system for ethnomedicine enterprises in
Guizhou province，and to promote the sustainable development of the ethnomedicine industry. METHODS：The draft of evaluation
index system had been made by documents collection and a meeting of focus group discussion，the final indexes and weight had
been determined by Delphi method for conducting 2 rounds expert questionnaire survey；the index system was used to measure and
compare the results with the evaluation results of the drug regulatory department and the authoritative experts of the industry.
RESULTS：The draft of evaluation index system included 6 indexes in the first level indicators and 49 indexes in the second. The
expert’s positive coefficients was 100％ after 2 rounds of consultation；the authoritative coefficients on the opinions of experts for
the levels of indicators were 0.86，the coordination coefficient of experts was 0.22 in the first round and 0.48 in the second. After 2
rounds of expert consultation，the final established evaluation index system contained 6 indexes in the first level indicators and 33
indexes in the second. Fifteen ethnomedicine enterprises in Guizhou province were selected for on-site testing. The evaluation
results were not much different from those of the drug regulatory department and the authoritative experts of the industry.
CONCLUSIONS：Established sustainable development ability evaluation index system for ethnomedicine enterprises is scientific，
reasonable and feasible，and can provide standardized reference for regular monitoring and evaluation.
KEYWORDS Ethnomedicine enterprises；Sustainable development ability；Delphi method；Expert consultation；Index system

近年来，我国出台了一系列政策文件，鼓励中药民 要求推进健康中国建设，促进中医药传承发展 等。这
[2]
族药事业发展，例如，党的“十九大”报告中提出要坚持 些政策和文件的相继出台为我国中药民族药企业可持
[1]
中西医并重，传承发展中医药事业 ；国家“十三五”规划 续发展提供了良好的环境，有助于中药民族药企业迅猛

2002，55（2）：287-316. ag Rev，2006，8（2）：71-89.
[24] KNOBEN J，OERLEMANS LA. Proximity and inter-orga- [25] 国家统计局社会科技和文化产业统计司，国家发展和改
nizational collaboration：a literature review[J]. Int J Man- 革委员会高技术产业司.中国高技术产业统计年鉴：
2017[R]. 2018.
Δ 基金项目：贵州省科技计划项目（No.黔科合基础〔2016〕
[26] 国家统计局.中国统计年鉴：2017[R]. 2017.
1515-1）；贵州省科学技术厅学术新苗培养及创新探索专项项目（No.
[27] 中共中央办公厅，国务院办公厅.关于进一步加强东西部
黔科合平台人才〔2017〕5718）
扶贫协作工作的指导意见[Z]. 2016-12-07.
＊硕士研究生。研究方向：医药产业发展战略管理。电话：
（收稿日期：2019-10-22 修回日期：2020-02-05）
0851-88308118。E-mail：947112563@qq.com
（编辑：孙 冰）
# 通信作者：教授，硕士生导师，博士。研究方向：医药产业发展
战略管理。电话：0851-88308118。E-mail：zhougeyao@163.com
·646 · China Pharmacy 2020 Vol. 31 No. 6 中国药房 2020年第31卷第6期