Page 136 - 《中国药房》2026年7期
P. 136

化疗致恶性肿瘤患儿骨髓抑制风险预测模型的系统评价
                                                                                                Δ


                *
                                 #
          何 莉 ,林 欣,蒋小平(重庆医科大学附属儿童医院护理部/儿童少年健康与疾病国家临床医学研究中心/儿
          童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室/儿童神经发育与认知障碍重庆市重点实验室,重庆 400014)

          中图分类号  R979.1      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2026)07-0954-06
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.07.22


          摘   要  目的  系统评价儿童恶性肿瘤化疗后骨髓抑制风险预测模型的建模策略、关键预测因子与预测性能,为临床决策与研究
          提供循证依据。方法  检索2025年4月之前发表于中国知网、万方数据、PubMed等11个数据库中的相关文献。文献筛选和信息
          提取由2位研究人员独立完成,模型的偏倚风险和适用性依照PROBAST工具进行严格评估。结果  最终筛选得到7项研究,其中
          英文文献4篇、中文文献3篇,涉及12个风险预测模型。多数模型在判别能力方面表现良好,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)
          为0.748~0.981,但仅有2项研究实施了外部验证;有3项研究未充分报告模型的校准信息。PROBAST评估结果显示,所有模型
          在偏倚风险方面均为高水平,主要问题包括以回顾性设计为主、样本代表性不足以及缺乏盲法评估等;但在适用性方面,所有模型
          的评价结果均为良好。在建模方法方面,多数研究采用传统logistic回归方法构建模型,仅少数研究引入了机器学习算法并对多
          种算法进行了系统性比较;采用机器学习方法的模型表现明显优于传统统计方法构建的模型。结论  现有的儿童恶性肿瘤化疗后
          骨髓抑制风险预测模型在临床风险预警中显示出潜力,但普遍存在以回顾性单中心设计为主、每变量事件数较低、缺失数据处理
          不透明、模型系数报告不一致等设计与方法学局限。未来研究应推进前瞻性设计,融合机器学习与关键临床变量,并严格遵循
          TRIPOD声明等报告规范,以提升模型的科学严谨性与临床适用性。
          关键词  风险预测模型;恶性肿瘤;化疗;骨髓抑制;儿童;预测方法

          Systematic  review  of  risk  prediction  models  for  chemotherapy-induced  myelosuppression  in  pediatric
          patients with malignant tumors
          HE Li,LIN Xin,JIANG Xiaoping(Dept.  of  Nursing,  Children’s  Hospital  of  Chongqing  Medical  University/
          National  Clinical  Medical  Research  Center  for  Children  and  Adolescents’  Health  and  Diseases/Ministry  of
          Education  Key  Laboratory  of  Child  Development  and  Disorders/Chongqing  Key  Laboratory  of  Child
          Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Disorders, Chongqing 400014, China)

          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE  To  systematically  evaluate  risk  prediction  models  for  chemotherapy-induced  myelosuppression  in
          pediatric  patients  with  malignant  tumors,  evaluate  their  modeling  strategies,  key  predictors,  and  predictive  performance,  and
          provide  evidence-based  references  for  clinical  decision-making  and  research.  METHODS  A  literature  search  was  conducted  across
          11  databases,  including  CNKI,  Wanfang  Data,  and  PubMed,  for  relevant  studies  published  before  April  2025.  Two  reviewers
          independently performed literature screening and data extraction, and the risk of bias and applicability of the models were evaluated
          using the PROBAST tool. RESULTS  Ultimately, seven studies were selected, of which four were English articles and three were
          Chinese  articles,  involving  12  risk  prediction  models.  Although  model  discrimination  was  good (AUC  0.748-0.981),  only  two
          models underwent external validation; furthermore, calibration was inadequately reported in three studies. PROBAST indicated that
          all  models  exhibited  a  high  risk  of  bias,  with  major  issues  including  a  predominance  of  retrospective  designs,  inadequate  sample
          representativeness, and lack of blinding. However, in terms of applicability, all models received favorable evaluations. In terms of
          modeling  methods,  most  studies  employed  traditional  logistic  regression  approaches  to  construct  models,  while  only  a  minority
          introduced  machine  learning  algorithms  and  conducted  systematic  comparisons  among  multiple  algorithms.  Models  developed  using
          machine  learning  methods  significantly  outperformed  those  constructed  with  traditional  statistical  methods.  CONCLUSIONS  The
          existing risk prediction models for myelosuppression after chemotherapy in children with malignant tumors demonstrate potential in
          clinical risk early warning. However, they generally suffer from design and methodological limitations, such as a predominance of
          retrospective  single-center  designs,  few  events  per  variable,  opaque  handling  of  missing  data,  and  inconsistent  reporting  of  model
                                                              coefficients.  Future  studies  should  adopt  prospective  designs,
              Δ 基金项目 重庆医科大学护理学院院级科学研究项目(No.
                                                              incorporate  machine  learning  with  key  clinical  predictors,  and
          20230308)                                           follow TRIPOD  reporting  guidelines  to  enhance  scientific  rigor
             *第一作者 护士,硕士研究生。研究方向:儿童肿瘤、心理护理。
          E-mail:2550650722@qq.com                            and clinical utility.
              # 通信作者 教授,主任护师,硕士生导师,硕士。研究方向:儿童                 KEYWORDS    risk  prediction  model;  malignant  tumor;
          肿瘤、心理护理。E-mail:1439638239@qq.com                    chemotherapy; myelosuppression; child; prediction method


          · 954 ·    China Pharmacy  2026 Vol. 37  No. 7                               中国药房  2026年第37卷第7期
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141