Page 59 - 《中国药房》2024年7期
P. 59

·药物与临床·


          3 种集采与非集采注射用头孢菌素有效性和安全性的多中心
          研究
                 Δ


                 1*
                                                                    2
                                   1
                          1 #
                                                            1
          刘 璐 ,宋沧桑 ,李兴德 ,邓雨琴 ,毛盼盼 ,张函舒 ,董艳珍 ,程瑶瑶(1.昆明市第一人民医院药学部,昆
                                                                            3
                                                    1
                                           1
          明 650224;2.大理大学药学院,云南 大理 671003;3.昆明医科大学附属甘美医院药学部,昆明 650224)
          中图分类号  R969.4      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2024)07-0825-06
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.07.10
          摘  要  目的  比较国家组织药品集中采购(简称“集采”)与非集采注射用头孢唑林钠、注射用头孢呋辛钠和注射用头孢他啶治疗
          细菌性感染患者的有效性和安全性。方法  回顾性收集昆明市19家医疗机构2020年1月至2022年9月使用过3种集采或非集采
          注射用头孢菌素治疗细菌性感染的住院患者的病例数据,采用倾向性评分匹配平衡组间基线差异后,分别比较3种集采与非集采
          注射用头孢菌素的有效性和安全性差异。结果  平衡组间基线差异后,注射用头孢唑林钠集采组与非集采组各394例,注射用头
          孢呋辛钠集采组与非集采组各472例,注射用头孢他啶集采组504例、非集采组590例。有效性方面,注射用头孢唑林钠和注射用
          头孢呋辛钠集采组与非集采组的临床有效率、72 h有效率、细菌清除率及体温、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、中性粒细胞百分比、
          C反应蛋白、降钙素原恢复率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);注射用头孢他啶集采组C反应蛋白恢复至正常参考范围的患
          者比例显著高于非集采组(46.9% vs. 27.9%,P<0.05),但其余有效性指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。安全性方面,3种注射
          用头孢菌素集采组患者的药品不良反应发生率与非集采组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);注射用头孢唑林钠集采组患者
          血小板计数降低的发生率显著高于非集采组(20.7% vs. 7.1%,P<0.05),注射用头孢他啶集采组患者嗜酸性粒细胞升高的发生率
          显著高于非集采组(5.3% vs. 1.9%,P<0.05)。此外,3种注射用头孢菌素其余实验室相关指标异常率的组间差异均无统计学意义
         (P>0.05)。结论  3种集采注射用头孢菌素的有效性不劣于非集采品种,安全性与非集采品种相当。
          关键词  注射用头孢唑林钠;注射用头孢呋辛钠;注射用头孢他啶;药品集中采购;头孢菌素

          Multicenter  study  on  the  efficacy  and  safety  of  3  kinds  of  Cephalosporin  for  injection  from  centralized
          procurement or non-centralized procurement
          LIU Lu ,SONG Cangsang ,LI Xingde ,DENG Yuqin ,MAO Panpan ,ZHANG Hanshu ,DONG Yanzhen ,
                                             1
                                  1
                 1
                                                           1
                                                                          1
                                                                                                           2
                                                                                           1
          CHENG Yaoyao(1. Dept. of Pharmacy, Kunming First People’s Hospital, Kunming 650224, China;2. College
                        3
          of Pharmacy, Dali University, Yunnan Dali 671003, China;3. Dept. of Pharmacy, Calmette Hospital Affiliated
          to Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650224, China)
          ABSTRACT   OBJECTIVE  To  compare  the  efficacy  and  safety  of  Cefazolin  sodium  for  injection,  Cefuroxime  sodium  for
          injection,  and  Ceftazidime  for  injection  from  nationally  organized  centralized  drug  procurement (hereinafter  referred  to  as
         “centralized  procurement”)  and  non-centralized  procurement  in  patients  with  bacterial  infection.  METHODS  The  case  data  of
          hospitalized  patients  who  had  used  3  kinds  of  Cephalosporins  for  injection  from  centralized  procurement  or  non-centralized
          procurement  in  the  treatment  of  bacterial  infections  were  retrospectively  collected  from  19  medical  institutions  in  Kunming  from
          January  2020  to  September  2022. After  balancing  the  baseline  differences  between  the  groups  with  the  propensity  score  matching
          method,  the  effectiveness  and  safety  differences  of  3  kinds  of  Cephalosporins  for  injection  from  centralized  procurement  or  non-
          centralized  procurement  were  compared  respectively.  RESULTS  After  balancing  the  baseline  differences  among  the  groups,  394
                                                             cases  in  each  group  of  Cefazolin  sodium  for  injection  from
             Δ 基金项目 云南省卫生健康委临床药学中心建设单位项目;云                   centralized  procurement  or  non-centralized  procurement,  472
          南省卫生健康委医学领军人才培养计划(No.L-2018012);昆明市卫生              cases  in  each  group  of  Cefuroxime  sodium  for  injection  from
          科技人才培养项目——医学科技领军人才培养计划[No.2023-SW(领                centralized  procurement  or  non-centralized  procurement,  504
          军)-04]                                             cases  in  group  of  Ceftazidime  for  injection  from  centralized
             * 第一作者 主 管 药 师 。 研 究 方 向 :医 院 药 学 。 E-mail:
                                                             procurement  and  590  cases  in  group  of  non-centralized
          1614798517@qq.com
             # 通信作者 主任药师,教授,硕士生导师。研究方向:临床药学、                 procurement  were  included  in  the  analysis.  In  terms  of
          药物基因组学。E-mail:songcs163@163.com                    effectiveness,  there  were  no  significant  differences  in  clinical


          中国药房  2024年第35卷第7期                                                 China Pharmacy  2024 Vol. 35  No. 7    · 825 ·
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64