Page 93 - 《中国药房》2021年8期
P. 93

·药物经济学·


        泛基因型直接抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎的成本-效用分析                                                                    Δ


              *
        魏 霞 ,杨 莉(北京大学公共卫生学院/北京大学医学部卫生政策与技术评估中心,北京 100191)
                       #
        中图分类号 R956          文献标志码 A          文章编号 1001-0408(2021)08-0979-07
        DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2021.08.14

        摘  要   目的:评价泛基因型直接抗病毒药物(DAAs)治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本-效用,为相关医疗卫生决策提供药物经济学
        证据。方法:从全社会角度出发,以中国初治慢性丙型肝炎患者为目标人群,参考文献资料建立Markov模型,以索磷布韦维帕他
        韦为对照,分析格卡瑞韦派伦他韦、索磷布韦+可洛派韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本-效用比
       (ICERs);采用敏感性分析验证结果的稳健性。结果:与索磷布韦维帕他韦相比,格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦增加了0.002 1 QALYs,成本增
        加25 021元,ICERs为12 129 031元/QALY(意愿支付阈值为70 892元/QALY),不具有成本-效用;当其单价下降至1 679元时(降
        价64.65%)将具有成本-效用。索磷布韦+可洛派韦增加了0.002 0 QALYs,成本减少515元,是成本节约的绝对优势方案。敏感性
        分析显示,持续病毒学应答率和药品价格对结果的影响最大,索磷布韦+可洛派韦具有成本-效用的概率高于格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦。
        结论:格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦需大幅降低价格,才可达到更好的可负担性;索磷布韦+可洛派韦具有良好的经济性。
        关键词    慢性丙型肝炎;直接抗病毒药物;成本-效用分析;Markov模型;泛基因型

        Cost-utility Analysis of the Pan-genotypic Direct-acting Antivirals in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C
        Infection
        WEI Xia,YANG Li(School of Public Health,Peking University/Health Policy and Technology Assessment
        Center,Peking University Health Science Center,Beijing 100191,China)

        ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the cost-utility of the pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals(DAAs)in the treatment of
        patients with chronic hepatitis C infection, and to provide pharmacoeconomic evidence for relevant health care decisions.
        METHODS:A Markov model was established from a societal perspective with newly diagnosed chronic hepatitis C patients in
        China as the target population,and analyzed quality-adjusted life years(QALYs)and incremental cost-utility ratios(ICERs)of
        patients with chronic hepatitis C with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir,glecaprevir/pibrentasvir,sofosbuvir+coblopasvir. Sensitivity analysis
        was used to verity the robustness of the results. RESULTS:Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir increased QALYs by 0.002 1 and costs by 25 021
        RMB,compared to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir;its ICERs was 12 129 031 yuan/QALY(willingness to pay threshold was 70 892
        yuan/QALY),which had no cost-utility;glecaprevir/pibrentasvir need to cut down the price by 64.65% to have cost-utility.
        Sofosbuvir + coblopasvir increased QALYs by 0.002 0 and saved costs by 515 yuan,so it was the optimal regimen which was
        cost-saving. Sensitivity analysis showed that SVR rates and drug prices were the most influential factors. The probability of having
        cost-utility for sofosbuvir+coblopasvir was higher than glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. CONCLUSIONS:Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir need to
        reduce the price to achieve better affordability. Sofosbuvir+coblopasvir shows economical advantage.
        KEYWORDS    Chronic hepatitis C virus infection;Direct-acting antivirals;Cost-utility analysis;Markov model;Pan-genotypic



                                                                                   [1]
            丙型肝炎是由丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染引起的传                        少见4型和5型的相关报道 。HCV慢性感染可导致肝
        染性肝病。HCV 是多变异病毒,主要包括 7 种基因型,                       脏慢性炎症坏死和纤维化,并可发展为肝硬化甚至肝
        我国丙型肝炎患者常见的HCV基因型从多到少依次为                           癌,对患者的健康和生命危害极大,已成为严重的社会
        1b型(56.8%)、2型(24.1%)、3型(9.1%)及6型(6.3%),            和公共卫生问题 。
                                                                         [1]
            Δ 基 金 项 目 :国 家 自 然 科 学 基 金 资 助 项 目(No.71673004;    世界卫生组织(WHO)发布的全球肝炎报告指出,
        No.71911530221)                                    2015年全球丙型肝炎发病率为23.7/10万,约有7 100万
           *硕士研究生。研究方向:卫生经济。E-mail:weixia_pku@163.                          [2]
                                                           人为慢性感染患者 。近年来,我国丙型肝炎的发病率
        com
                                                           也逐年增高,从 2008 年的 8.21/10 万人增长至 2018 年的
           # 通信作者:研究员,博士生导师。研究方向:药物经济与政策。
        电话:010-82805650。E-mail:lyang@bjmu.edu.cn           15.79/10 万人 [3-4] 。肝硬化及肝癌是丙型肝炎患者的主


        中国药房    2021年第32卷第8期                                              China Pharmacy 2021 Vol. 32 No. 8  ·979 ·
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98