Page 7 - 《中国药房》2025年12期
P. 7

·药事管理·


          我国非处方药市场准入优化路径现状调研及国际经验应用建议
                                                                                                           Δ

                          2
                                  1, 3 #
                 1*
          卢 娜 ,郝海平 ,丁佐奇 (1.中国药科大学国际医药商学院,南京 210009;2.中国药科大学药学院,南京
          210009;3.中国药科大学《中国天然药物》编辑部,南京 210009)
          中图分类号  R95      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2025)12-1417-07
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.12.01

          摘  要  目的  为优化我国非处方药(OTC)市场准入流程提供参考。方法  在文献调研的基础上设计调查问卷,通过问卷星平台
          向来自医药企业、药品监管机构、行业协会、医疗机构和高校的受访者发放问卷,对回收的调查数据进行统计分析。结果  共回收
          154份问卷,均为有效问卷。58.5%的受访者来自医药企业,18.8%的受访者来自药品监管领域,另有22.7%的受访者来自高校和
          医疗机构;超过半数受访者的工作年限≥10年。89.6%的受访者呼吁建立OTC独立审评体系;88.3%的受访者认为有必要建立符
          合我国国情的OTC专论制度;73.4%的受访者认为应规范专论纳入程序及流程;77.3%的受访者认为应完善处方药转换为OTC的
          具体流程;91.0%的受访者认为真实世界数据/证据可有助于简化OTC上市路径,但在数据质量和数据获取方面存在难点。结论
          我国OTC市场准入机制审评周期较长,建议我国可参考国际经验,构建“制度重构-技术革新-监管创新”三位一体的本土化适配优
          化路径,为建立科学高效的OTC监管体系提供决策依据。
          关键词  非处方药;市场准入;注册审评;路径优化;国际经验


          Current  situation  research  on  the  optimization  path  of  market  access  for  over-the-counter  drugs  in  China
          and suggestions for the application of international experience
                 1
                                2
          LU Na ,HAO Haiping ,DING Zuoqi       1, 3  (1.  School  of  International  Pharmaceutical  Business,  China
          Pharmaceutical  University,  Nanjing  210009,  China;2.  School  of  Pharmacy,  China  Pharmaceutical  University,
          Nanjing  210009,  China;3.  Editor  Office  of  Chinese  Journal  of  Natural  Medicines,  China  Pharmaceutical
          University, Nanjing 210009, China)

          ABSTRACT   OBJECTIVE To provide a reference for optimizing the market access process for over-the-counter drugs (OTC) in
          China. METHODS Based on literature review, questionnaire survey was designed and distributed via the Wenjuanxing platform to
          respondents  from  pharmaceutical  enterprises,  drug  regulatory  agencies,  industry  associations,  medical  institutions  and  universities.
          The collected survey data were then subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS A total of 154 questionnaires were collected, all of
          which  were  valid.  Among  the  respondents,  58.5%  were  from  pharmaceutical  enterprises,  18.8%  were  from  the  field  of  drug
          regulation,  and  the  remaining  22.7%  were  from  universities  and  medical  institutions.  More  than  half  of  the  respondents  had  been
          working for 10 years or more. A total of 89.6% of the respondents called for the establishment of an independent review system for
          OTC. Additionally, 88.3% believed it was necessary to establish an OTC monograph system based on China’s national conditions.
          Meanwhile,  73.4%  of  respondents  believed  it  was  necessary  to  standardize  the  monograph  inclusion  procedures  and  processes,
          while  77.3%  thought  the  specific  process  for  switching  prescription  drugs  to  OTC  status  should  be  improved.  Furthermore,  91.0%
          of  the  respondents  considered  that  real-world  data/evidence  could  contribute  to  simplifying  the  OTC  market  approval  pathway,
          although  challenges  related  to  data  quality  and  data  accessibility  were  acknowledged.  CONCLUSIONS  The  review  cycle  for
          China’s  OTC  market  access  mechanism  is  relatively  long.  A  localized  adaptation  and  optimization  path  of “institutional
          reconstruction-technological  innovation-regulatory  innovation”  in  a  trinity  is  proposed  to  provide  a  decision-making  basis  for
          establishing a scientific and efficient OTC regulatory system with international experience serving as a reference.
          KEYWORDS    OTC; market access; registration review; path optimization; international experience



                                                                 我国自2000年实施药品分类管理制度以来,已初步
             Δ 基金项目  江苏省药品监督管理局药品监管科学科研计划项目
                                                             构建了处方药与非处方药(over-the-counter drugs,OTC)
         (No.202451)                                         的差异化监管框架,并明确了两类药品在流通、使用及
             *第一作者 硕士研究生。研究方向:管理药学(监管科学)。E-
                                                             监管中的界限。2020 年新修订的《药品注册管理办法》
          mail:ln15555389156@163.com
             # 通信作者 教授,博士生导师,博士。研究方向:科学计量学和科                 进一步规范了 OTC 的注册审评流程,确立了以“处方药
          技评价研究。E-mail:zqding1028@163.com                    转换”和“直接注册”为主的双轨制准入模式。然而,我


          中国药房  2025年第36卷第12期                                              China Pharmacy  2025 Vol. 36  No. 12    · 1417 ·
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12