Page 93 - 《中国药房》2022年3期
P. 93
分别增加至 GSD 组的 1.13~1.41 倍、Papp 分别增加至 Fort. root decoction:purification and identification[J]. J
GSD组的1.25~1.83倍;而相比MSSGD组,SGD组中甘 Tradit Complement Med,2016,7(2):178-187.
草各成分在回肠的吸收进一步增加,各成分的Ka分别增 [11] ZHOU J W,GAO G Z,CHU Q P,et al. Chromatographic
加至MSSGD组的1.19~1.48倍、Papp分别增加至MSSGD isolation of nanoparticles from Ma-Xing-Shi-Gan-Tang
组的 1.30~1.80 倍。这说明芍药成分参与了 SAN 的形 decoction and their characterization[J]. J Ethnopharmacol,
成,比芍药成分与SAN物理混合更有利于甘草成分在肠 2014,151(3):1116-1123.
[12] ZHUANG Y,YAN J J,ZHU W,et al. Can the aggregation
段的吸收。有文献报道,纳米粒的形态对其肠道吸收亦 be a new approach for understanding the mechanism of
[24]
有影响,球形纳米粒比棒状纳米粒更容易吸收 。本研
traditional Chinese medicine?[J]. J Ethnopharmacol,
究在对各水煎液进行形态观察时发现,MSSGD 中存在 2008,117(2):378-384.
棒状或梭形SAN,而SGD中存在球形SAN,这也可能是 [13] 沈成英,胡菲,朱君君,等.中药自组装纳米粒的形成及应
SGD 中甘草成分比 MSSGD 中甘草成分在肠道中吸收 用研究进展[J].中国中药杂志,2021,46(19):4875-4880.
更好的原因之一。 [14] LÜ S,SU H,SUN S,et al. Isolation and characterization
综上所述,相比 GSD、MSSGD,SGD 能显著改善甘 of nanometre aggregates from a Bai-Hu-Tang decoction
草中难溶性成分的体外释放、促进甘草主要成分在回肠 and their antipyretic effect[J]. Sci Rep,2018,8(1):
的吸收,说明SGD-SAN形成可能是芍药、甘草配伍增效 12209.
的物理结构基础。 [15] LIN D,DU Q,WANG H Q,et al.Antidiabetic micro-/
参考文献 nanoaggregates from Ge-Gen-Qin-Lian-Tang decoction in-
[ 1 ] 陈平,曾瑾,杨安东,等.古代经典名方芍药甘草汤的处方 crease absorption of baicalin and cellular antioxidant acti-
及关键信息考证[J/OL].中药药理与临床,2021-05-24[2021- vity in vitro[J]. Biomed Res Int,2017,2017:9217912.
11-10].https://doi.org/10.13412/j.cnki.zyyl.20210524.001. [16] 沈成英,朱君君,戴博,等.芍药甘草汤自组装纳米粒的形
[ 2 ] 曲缘章,马生军,朱广伟,等.芍药甘草汤的历史沿革与现 成及其对白芍主要成分释放和吸收的影响[J].中国中药
代研究[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2020,26(6):216-225. 杂志,2021,46(9):2190-2196.
[ 3 ] 吴玲芳,李雨桐,唐迎紫,等.芍药甘草汤化学成分及药理 [17] 鲁亚奇,罗寒燕,王丽霞,等.甘草炒制过程中主要成分的
作用研究进展[J]. 药物评价研究,2021,44(6):1354- 含量变化及转化规律分析[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,
1360. 2020,26(10):100-106.
[ 4 ] BI X L,GONG M R,DI L Q. Review on prescription com- [18] 吕鹏,卞广兴,温利青,等.甘草素在体肠吸收及体外血脑
patibility of Shaoyao Gancao decoction and reflection on 屏障通透性研究[J].中国新药杂志,2008,17(8):661-
pharmacokinetic compatibility mechanism of traditional 666.
Chinese medicine prescription based on in vivo drug [19] 苏红,王新春,黄志巧,等.单向灌流法研究异甘草素在大
interaction of main efficacious components[J]. Evid Based 鼠体肠吸收[J].中成药,2010,32(11):1908-1910.
Complement Alternat Med,2014,2014:208129. [20] 马婷婷,贺蕊,龚慕辛,等.不同配伍比例芍药甘草汤成分
[ 5 ] 郭珊珊,王谦,白立川,等.芍药-甘草配伍的研究进展[J]. 的肠吸收研究[J].中国中药杂志,2015,40(21):4268-
中草药,2014,45(10):1481-1485. 4274.
[ 6 ] 王蕾,曹雪晓,栗焕焕,等.中药化学成分的分子识别与自 [21] WANG X X,LIU G Y,YANG Y F,et al. Intestinal absorp-
组装在中药研究中的应用[J].中草药,2020,51(2): tion of triterpenoids and flavonoids from Glycyrrhizae ra-
516-521. dix et rhizoma in the human Caco-2 monolayer cell mo-
[ 7 ] LI T,WANG P L,GUO W B,et al. Natural berberine-based del[J]. Molecules,2017,22(10):1627.
Chinese herb medicine assembled nanostructures with [22] JIANG T,SINGH B,LI H S,et al. Targeted oral delivery
modified antibacterial application[J]. ACS Nano,2019,13 of BmpB vaccine using porous PLGA microparticles coa-
(6):6770-6781. ted with M cell homing peptide-coupled chitosan[J]. Bio-
[ 8 ] TIAN X H,WANG P L,LI T,et al. Self-assembled natural materials,2014,35(7):2365-2373.
phytochemicals for synergistically antibacterial applica- [23] RAJAPAKSAT E,STOVER-HAMER M,FERNANDEZ X,
tion from the enlightenment of traditional Chinese medi- et al. Claudin 4-targeted protein incorporated into PLGA
cine combination[J]. Acta Pharm Sin B,2020,10(9): nanoparticles can mediate M cell targeted delivery[J]. J
1784-1795. Control Rel,2010,142(2):196-205.
[ 9 ] HU J,WU Z S,YAN J J,et al. A promising approach for [24] ERNSTING M J,MURAKAMI M,ROY A,et al. Factors
understanding the mechanism of traditional Chinese medi- controlling the pharmacokinetics,biodistribution and intra-
cine by the aggregation morphology[J]. J Ethnopharma- tumoral penetration of nanoparticles[J]. J Control Release,
col,2009,123(2):267-274. 2013,172(3):782-794.
[10] ZHOU J W,LIU J,LIN D,et al. Boiling-induced nanopar- (收稿日期:2021-09-15 修回日期:2021-12-20)
(编辑:林 静)
ticles and their constitutive proteins from Isatis indigotica
中国药房 2022年第33卷第3期 China Pharmacy 2022 Vol. 33 No. 3 ·343 ·