Page 20 - 《中国药房》2026年7期
P. 20

美国药品调剂服务收费制度研究及其对我国的启示
                                                                                         Δ


                *
                                 #
          廖诗语 ,伍 琳,陈永法(中国药科大学国际医药商学院,南京 211198)
          中图分类号  R95      文献标志码  A      文章编号  1001-0408(2026)07-0842-06
          DOI  10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.07.03

          摘   要  目的  借鉴美国药品调剂服务收费实践经验,为我国药品调剂服务收费方案设计提供参考。方法  检索相关文献及官方
          网站,系统梳理美国药品调剂服务的收费历程、不同医疗保险计划的收费方式及标准、收费考量因素,总结其收费特点,对我国完
          善相关工作提出建议。结果与结论  美国药品调剂服务收费制度历经理念萌芽、模式探索、制度建立与专业化发展4个阶段,逐步
          形成独立于药品价格、以处方为单元的收费方式。各类医疗保险计划在联邦政府的统一框架下,依据真实调剂成本并结合药品类
          别、药房类型、处方量及政策目标等因素制定差异化调剂收费方案,以体现药师专业价值并保障调剂服务可持续供给。我国虽已
          在国家层面认可药品调剂服务收费,但仍面临价值认知不足与医疗保险支付压力双重落地障碍。建议借鉴美国经验,结合我国国
          情,加强药品调剂服务价值评估实证研究助力医疗保险决策;统一药品调剂服务成本测算口径,并结合药师专业技术价值与公共
          利益,明确收费标准制定依据;以省份为统筹、以处方为单元探索差异化收费方案,注重突出专业技术、调剂风险等;辅以持续强化
          药师专业能力建设,从而实现药品调剂服务收费政策的科学制定与合理落地。
          关键词  药品调剂;调剂费;价值评估;收费制度;药学服务

          Study on pharmacy dispensing fee system in the United States and its implications for China
          LIAO Shiyu,WU Lin,CHEN Yongfa(School  of  International  Pharmaceutical  Business,China  Pharmaceutical
          University, Nanjing 211198, China)

          ABSTRACT    OBJECTIVE  To  draw  upon  the  United  States’  experience  in  charging  for  drug  dispensing  services  and  provide
          reference for designing China’s fee scheme for such services. METHODS Relevant literature and official websites were reviewed to
          systematically  summarize  the  evolution  of  dispensing  fees  in  the  U. S.,  charging  methods  and  standards  across  different  health
          insurance  plans,  and  factors  influencing  fee  determination.  The  key  characteristics  of  the  U. S.  fee  system  were  summarized.
          Recommendations for improving China’s related practices were then proposed. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS The U.S. dispensing
          fee  system  has  undergone  four  stages  of  conceptual  emergence,  model  exploration,  system  establishment,  and  professional
          development,  forming  a  prescription-based  charging  model  independent  of  drug  prices.  Under  a  unified  federal  framework,  health
          insurance  programs  set  a  differentiated  dispensing  fee  system  based  on  actual  costs  and  factors  such  as  drug  category,  pharmacy
          type,  prescription  volume,  and  policy  objectives,  reflecting  pharmacists’  professional  value  and  ensuring  sustainable  service
          provision.  Although  China  has  recognized  dispensing  fees  at  the  national  level,  implementation  still  faces  barriers  including
          insufficient  value  recognition  and  pressure  on  medical  insurance  payment.  Drawing  on  U. S.  experience  and  considering  China’s
          national  context,  it  is  recommended  to  strengthen  empirical  research  on  the  value  assessment  of  dispensing  services  to  support
          medical  insurance  decision-making;  standardize  the  methodology  for  dispensing  cost  measurement  and  clarify  the  basis  for  fee
          setting  by  incorporating  pharmacists’  professional  and  technical  value  as  well  as  public  interests;  explore  differentiated  charging
          models at the provincial level with prescriptions as the basic unit, with emphasis on professional expertise and dispensing risks, and
          continuously  strengthen  pharmacists’  professional  capacity  to  facilitate  the  scientific  formulation  and  effective  implementation  of
          dispensing service fee policies.
          KEYWORDS     drug dispensing; dispensing fees; value assessment; charging system; pharmaceutical services


              2023年9月,《全国医疗服务项目技术规范(2023年                     药学服务项目,从国家层面正式认可和补偿药学服务价
          版)》(以下简称《项目技术规范》)首次纳入药师门诊诊                          值。然而,在各地后续发布的药学类医疗服务项目中,
          察、处方/医嘱药品调剂、住院患者个性化用药监护 3 项                         均未见药品调剂服务费(以下简称“调剂费”)相关举措,

              Δ 基金项目 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.72404280);中            这提示《项目技术规范》在全国范围内落地不畅。药品
          国药科大学国家执业药师发展研究中心立项课题(No.ndrplc202301,              调剂作为药师日常工作的核心,若不能实现合理收费,
          No.NRCLPD202502)                                    不仅会使药师的价值无法得到真正体现,而且会严重影
             *第一作者 硕士研究生。研究方向:医药卫生政策与法规。
                                                              响药师的积极性与服务质量,最终影响患者获益 。因
                                                                                                        [1]
          E-mail:15343289302@163.com
                                                              此,需尽快推动我国药品调剂服务收费政策落地,激发
              # 通信作者 教授,博士生导师,博士。研究方向:医药卫生政策与
          法规。E-mail:cyf9906@163.com                           药师积极性,从而更好地服务患者。

          · 842 ·    China Pharmacy  2026 Vol. 37  No. 7                               中国药房  2026年第37卷第7期
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25